Jitender Gupta
Injection required: A remote primary health centre in Narkatiaganj, Bihar
health: rural missions
Blocked Vessels
A pan-India rural health project is suffering
The Doctor Is Out

  • Rs 1,30,000 crore National Rural Health Mission launched in 2006
  • Planning Commission says human resources a big problem for the NRHM
  • Severe shortage of trained medical, managerial and administrative staff
  • NRHM wants “architectural changes” in rural health system, decentralising of allocated projects in the states

***

The National Rural Health Mission (NRHM), launched in 2006 as the UPA’s flagship project that would dramatically change the healthcare system in rural India, is already under review. Three years on, the general consensus within the Planning Commission and international partners is that there are several shortfalls on the supply side and that there is a need to reorient the mission.

For a project with a budget of over Rs 1,30,000 crore, it’s human resource that’s proved to be the deficiency. The NRHM was aimed at making ‘architectural changes’ in the public delivery system by increasing communitisation and decentralisation with a focus on 18 states over seven years. However, a severe shortage of trained/skilled medical staff is impacting the project’s capacity to deliver, says a recent primary evaluation done by the Planning Commission in four states. Kaveri Gill, who wrote the May ’09 working paper for the Commission, says: “Human resources is probably the project’s single largest challenge. It is most complex and requires a long-term solution in terms of education and training.”

In her paper, detailed from a study in Andhra Pradesh, UP, Bihar and Rajasthan, she highlights the problem of staff shortage, absenteeism, lack of managerial staff leading to large amounts of the allocated funds remaining unspent. “Health is a state subject. And with centrally sponsored schemes such as the NRHM, the problem of who takes ownership or credit comes up. Not all states are equally responsive,” notes Gill.

An increase in institutional delivery is one of the more celebrated achievements of the NRHM, with officials attributing the fall in Maternal Mortality Rate to it. But ground reports claim the infrastructure is inadequate to support the demand. “There has been a surge of women patients but the infrastructure to cope with them is inadequate. They are given one meal a day and post-partum care is inadequate,” says Kimberley Allen, a UNICEF health specialist. World Bank health specialist Vikram Rajan adds, “You want to move to a model that pays less for inputs but more for results. The Indian government needs to look at the centrally sponsored schemes and stimulate behaviours from the states with some intense handholding.”

With the onus on the states, NRHM projects have naturally received varying degrees of focus. Recent figures show that apart from Bihar, where a large chunk of funds are lying unspent, other states have shown an increase in capacity in the past one year. But a lot more needs to be done. “What is going to hold India back is 6-7 poorly performing states. We have to go beyond what the NRHM has done so far and start introducing more managerial capacity in these states,” says Gerard M. La Forgia, lead health specialist, South Asia Human Development Department, World Bank.

The government, of course, also wants critics to be sensitive to the difficulties. Says Amarjeet Sinha, joint secretary in the Union health ministry, “We are on the right track but it will take some time before the results show.... Every year, we produce 33,000 medical graduates but very few come into the public system so we are developing incentives for them.” Tamil Nadu has reserved 50 per cent of seats in PG courses for those who have served in rural areas. Now 18 other states are adopting the same system. “Measures are being taken now to get doctors back into the public system. There are challenges in human resources...we are trying to overcome them,” says Sinha. Overcome challenges, that’s the key if mega projects like the NRHM are to deliver optimal results.

 
Daily Mail
COLLAPSE COMMENTS :
HAVE YOUR SAY
Nov 08, 2009 02:50 AM
2
One would think that a poor backward state like Bihar would jump at the chance to utilize federal govt money to benefit its poverty-wracked masses. But no such luck here.
Shows how much state govts really care about the welfare of the masses.
It's a shame really.
Bodh
Springfield, United States
Nov 07, 2009 05:33 PM
1
Rs.1.5 crores! - for a PG seat in Radiology! 1.5 followed by seven zeroes!
Rs.1.3 crores! - for a PG seat in Orthopaedics!

Imagine! Can YOU pay Rs. 20000 Every single Day for FULL three years to get a post graduate degree? Are you out of your mind?

And - Is it REALLY worth the price? This is After your already spending princely sums of money and valuable time, for MBBS!

Where did things go so horribly wrong, and who are the anti-nationals, ruthlessly gaining from this?
WHY do we Indians still have to manage with a pathetic doctor-population ratio of 1:1800, ( 1 : 400 in the UK and 1 : 300 in Germany)? Why do we not even THINK of training more doctors for unforeseen natural calamities like a swine flu or a mass casualty?

ANTICIPATED DOCTOR SHORTAGE :

A DEVELOPING India in 2025, is going to require vastly more doctors - because Indian doctors will also be attracted by the massive shortage that is predicted in the developed countries ( underline )!

India is also projected to be the future diabetic capital of the world, not to mention TB, HIV, heart disease and a variety of other disease!

REASONS FOR SHORTAGE IN INDIA :

Historically, strikes by medical students in the 70's and 80's against increasing medical seats, coupled with the government lifting the ban on Indian doctors working abroad, guaranteed the huge shortage of doctors.

This acute shortage lead, in the 90's, to a huge premium for seats in the available 'private' medical colleges. This coincided with allegations of huge sums of corruption money to the Medical Council of India ( MCI ), responsible for granting recognition to private colleges. While whole districts go without even a single specialist!

In 1994, the JAMA (Journal of the American Medical Association) predicted a SURPLUS of 165,000 doctors by 2000. This turned out not only to be a bad prediction, but probably intended to protect the careers of the existing doctors. Unless more medical students begin training soon, the supply of physicians will begin to shrink in about 10 years when doctors from the baby boom generation retire in large numbers.

And these doctors will be from those scarce ones trainedfrom Indian private medical colleges.

DOCTOR-PRIVATE COLLEGE-MCI PROTECTIONIST NEXUS/MAFIA :

For Indians, becoming a doctor ( or any other training ) is a means to get a fortune, rather than a profession. While a doctor in the west may earn 2 or 3 times the Per Capita Income of his country, an Indian doctor expects to earn 100 times the PCI!

Look at private medical colleges - Most of them (unethically) manipulate figures of infrastructure and patients in order to gain points for recognition.

SRM College ( private ) / Out patients : 1,000 PD / 16 MS ortho seats / 1.5 C per seat,
General Hospital ( govt.) / Out patients : 12,000 PD / 3 MS ortho seats/ 1 L per seat

These figures can be interpreted in either of these TWO ways :

1. The chances of getting a seat in a private medical college is far in excess of getting one in a government college ( with vastly better infrastructure )

2. The government colleges are deliberately not being allocated more seats, since that will harm the prospect of the MCI making money.

The MCI also discourages Dip.N.B courses, since that too harms its earning potential. The chief of the corrupt MCI, of two decades, called KETAN DESAI ( google for him ), is worth 2000 crores - already! While politicians PROMISE medical colleges in every district, 99% of this is NOT converted to REALITY because of this obstructionist body called MCI. Most district hospital infrastructure is not used to provide any training.

The doctor mafia also regularly overestimates the costs of starting a medical college - in order to discourage more doctors.

COMPARE this with the situation in western countries, where PG courses are available EVEN in their district hospitals ( where the clinical material is hardly good in comparison with those in our government hospitals). While our district hospitals ( built in the British era ), does not provide training - medical or male nursing.

GENDER INEQUALITY IN MEDICAL EDUCATION ( AS WITH OTHER JOBS ) :

There is a huge gender bias here, as everywhere else. The number of female medical graduates today far exceeds the fertile imagination of any androphobic of 10 years ago! For almost 2 out of 3 medical seats are taken by females in the western world today! Much of this bias is defended on the illogical ground that it 'takes a woman doctor to treat a woman!' Unless males wake up to this bias, ( along with the way society is structured against them ), this will not change!

This is in keeping with the male-phobic trends in society, relegating men to menial jobs, while staking claim on managerial jobs. The justification is a grudge against males for the progress they have made as a gender.

http://timesofindia....icleshow/4912815.cms ( MALES not allowed into nursing in Tamil Nadu )
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/8077083.stm ( Bias favouring women for selection to doctor training )
( WAKE UP, MALE DOCTORS! SPEAK UP! )

The poor educational infrastructure is not limited to medicine alone. For example, even though it takes just a few months to train a pilot, most Indian pilots demand a pay far in excess of one lakh a month.

What has gone wrong with our education system as a WHOLE? Will the government sit up and take notice?
Partha persistent spammer
chennai, India
COLLAPSE COMMENTS   
Post a Comment
You are not logged in, please log in or register
ABOUT US | CONTACT US | SUBSCRIBE | ADVERTISING RATES | COPYRIGHT & DISCLAIMER | COMMENTS POLICY