Stark contrast: A road being constructed in the China-administered Tibet Autonomous Region; and below, one being laid on the Indian side, in Arunachal Pradesh’s Tawang region
Arunachal pradesh
On The Wrong Side Of Geography?
With India having given them nothing but neglect, the Arunachalis wonder if they’d have been better off with China
Arunachal pradesh
The Centre may put up a show of good intention, but it seldom comes to any sort of fruition
Outlook
tawang
China’s stand on Tawang lies inextricably close to its suspicions of India’s intentions on Tibet. Therein lies the rub....
Pranay Sharma
opinion
Let there be no war. Let bhai-bhai one-upmanship last forever.
Mohan Guruswamy
the india complex
Is it paranoia or just plain old envy because China has surged far ahead of us in every field?
Pranay Sharma
china eye view
The Indian media reserves its vitriol for China. It’s horribly unfair.
Wang Yaodong
bilateral trade
Trade is growing. But a closer look finds India chafing at inequalities.
Lola Nayar
Column
A stronger India must counter China with open-minded caution
K.S. Bajpai
Tawang
  • Flashpoint 1 Appalling infrastructure makes Arunachalis wonder how New Delhi can ignore such a sensitive border state
  • Flashpoint 2 It’s particularly shameful when you look at all the development just across the border, on the Chinese side
  • Flashpoint 3 There is resentment over dilution of tribal identity, especially on account of the imposition of Hindi
  • Flashpoint 4 A corrupt electoral system is helping elect people who have the money but don’t necessarily represent people
  • Flashpoint 5 Hydel projects will lead to influx of migrants and  hasty environmental
    clearances will wreak havoc

***

Travelling through the plains of upper Assam one late October afternoon, wending our way from picturesque Tawang to Arunachal’s capital Itanagar, an irony keeps hitting us at every turn. To access one part of Arunachal from another, we must suffer this tedious journey through Assam. It’s here that we run into Ritesh (name changed), an indigenous Arunachali who’s a journalist with a government media agency based in Itanagar. He recalls the day he went across the McMahon Line, which divides India from China, for the first time in his life—and saw what China was all about. Actually, Ritesh didn’t really see mainstream China but the region euphemistically called the Tibet Autonomous Region (TAR).

 
 
“A Naga tribal’s as alien to me as he is to you. Then why should we be clubbed together as the Northeast?”— Moji Riba, Filmmaker
 
 
Ritesh could cross the McMahon Line because of a tradition that the Indian and Chinese military follow diligently every year. On August 15, a Chinese delegation crosses over to Tawang at Bum La; on October 2, to commemorate the Chinese National Day, an Indian delegation crosses over into TAR. On these two days, both sides jointly hoist the respective flags of their countries. Amidst bonhomie, each delegation shows off its country’s achievements to the other. It was on one such trip that Ritesh witnessed China’s progress. “The roads were beautiful,” he reminisces, “the villages swank and the infrastructure fantastic. Then I recalled the road I’d taken from Tezpur over two days to get there and I began to wonder where Arunachal would have been had it continued under China post-1962.”

The visit was a mind-bending experience for Ritesh, prompting him to take a relook at his assumptions, at the idea of India he had inherited. He, after all, belongs to what can be called the post-’62 generation, those born in the years following the Indo-China conflict. They know of China as the aggressor, an image recurring in the narration of their grandfathers. Now, however, Ritesh has seen the other China—a superpower in the making, hurtling down the road to development at breakneck speed.


Whose goose is being cooked: Arunachali tribals resent the loss of their way of life and dilution of their tribal identity

Quite understandably, China dominates the thoughts and memories of most Arunachalis. The tribes here still lingered in their pre-industrial ways of life when in October 1962, as the winter chill set in, the Chinese stormed into India through Bum La on the west and the Dibang valley in the east, sweeping past Indian defences to advance to the gates of Tezpur in Assam. The ’62 war sent shock waves countrywide. But for Arunachalis—indigenous people aeons away from the mainstream in material culture—a modern war machine playing out its drama on their territory marked the end of innocence. Indeed, 1962 isn’t just a year for them. For many, it is the beginning of the end.

Says Moji Riba, an erudite and articulate filmmaker whose father was briefly the chief minister years ago, “Our society developed at such a speed that we couldn’t catch up post-’62. Most people like my grandfather never saw a wheel when they emerged from the jungles. And yet, they saw jets flying in the air. From pre-wheel to jet age in 40-odd years, can any society evolve in this manner without consequences?”

 
 
The Arunachalis have found their stories under Chinese occupation banished from contemporary history.
 
 
The ’62 war became part of the Indian consciousness. But Arunachal and its people, ironically, were pushed to the margins of this consciousness. Somehow, there was no zeal to develop this vulnerable border state. Today, as you travel on the potholed roads, struggle to make a call, encounter a generally appalling infrastructure, Arunachalis have just one question to ask: how could a disputed state such as theirs be so neglected by New Delhi? Worse, as Arunachalis languished and lagged behind other states, they found their stories under Chinese occupation lasting two months—the only people in independent India to have suffered this—banished from the pages of contemporary history. The war had left behind a people who’d remember those months for generations to come. The invasion began to shape their lives, their future, their identities.

Riba belongs to a new generation of Arunachalis in search of their ethnic identities, frustrated as the youth is with New Delhi’s insensitive policies. “They club us as the Northeast. But a Naga tribal is as alien to me as he is to you. Then why should we be clubbed together and why should our paradigm for development be the same?” Riba now spends his time travelling through the state documenting the oral histories of the various tribes of Arunachal. It is, in a way, his protest against the post-’62 onslaught of Hindi.


What are we defending?: An Indian army soldier patrols the snow-clad mountains of Tawang

Riba explains, “People of our age now speak to each other in Hindi, our second language, because it was taught for years in our schools, while our ancient tribal languages were forgotten. New Delhi never bothered to understand or value our culture. Now, we seem to be getting lost in the deluge.” For many like Riba, Delhi is a colonial power, imposing its will on a people and deciding their fate. And what a fate New Delhi has decreed for them.

 
 
“The PM comes in a special plane, makes lofty announcements, and leaves. How will he ever understand us?”—Mamang Dai, Fiction writer
 
 
“Look at the roads,” says Mamang Dai, the daughter of a former civil servant who managed to escape the Chinese troops by a whisker and trekked through the jungles for days to reach Assam. “But the Indian army viewed him with suspicion, thinking he was Chinese too. Sometimes, just because we look different makes it impossible for us to be identified as Indians. In fact, many of our fellow Indians barely know us on the map.”

An accomplished fiction writer, Dai makes her disappointment with Delhi quite evident through her writings in the local papers. Citing Prime Minister Manmohan Singh’s October visit to the state as an example, she notes sardonically, “He comes in on a special plane, makes lofty announcements, waves and then leaves. How does he expect to understand us? Look at the special Rs 24,000-crore package he announced for Arunachal in January last year. Has any of those proposals moved beyond the files? Nothing.” In fact, Dai’s anger was articulated in a letter current chief minister Dorjee Khandu submitted recently to the PM in Delhi (see box).

 
 
Local journalists estimate each winning candidate spent at least Rs 15 crore these assembly polls to get elected.
 
 
Much of the Arunachalis’ frustration stems from the rampant corruption that has now become synonymous with elections here. Tongam Rina, a columnist with The Arunachal Times, noted how three Congress MLAs, including CM Khandu, were elected unopposed from their constituencies. “It has got everyone talking in the state. Thankfully, the other 57 seats saw some kind of contest.” Most politicians are willing to switch parties for a price; local journalists estimate a winning candidate spent at least Rs 15 crore in the recent assembly poll to get elected. Rampant electoral corruption has skewed the system, sending to the legislature those who may be rich but don’t necessarily represent the people or their interests.

Perhaps this also explains the lack of development in the state, its decrepit roads and poor communication facilities. Ironically, in Arunachal’s border districts, the Airtel signal pops up on cellphones from towers located across the McMahon Line. These districts are yet to get similar mobile towers on the Indian side. Likewise, a strategically important road such as the Tezpur-Tawang-Bum La highway resembles a dirt track. “How can a state that India claims is so important have such pathetic roads?” asks Dai. Lost on New Delhi is the fact that these are the very roads that 2,420 Indian army officers and soldiers died defending, fighting the Chinese with their bare hands after exhausting their ammunition. Says taxi driver Tsering Dondup, who takes 18 hours to cover the 465-km distance between Tawang and Tezpur, “A few trips on these roads are enough to condemn any vehicle. How do you expect people here to survive? We hear the Chinese have trains running to Tibet. Here, we can’t even build roads.”

 
 
A trans-Arunachal highway was slated but bids for it “were rejected by the surface transport ministry”.—Dorjee Khandu, Arunachal CM
 
 
Worse, Arunachalis fear that the Centre’s development plan could swamp them completely and dilute their identity further. For instance, as the state signs a spate of MoUs to begin hydel power projects (worth Rs 2,50,000 crore), the people hear fear the advent of migrant workers, believing they are bound to be settled on tribal land. Smaller tribes such as the Eidu Mishmi feel it’s a holocaust in the making. “The money will disappear into private coffers, while small tribes like ours will get washed away by the deluge of migrant workers,” says Tone Mickrow, general secretary of the Eidu Mishmi students’ union.

New Delhi’s chattering classes often cite India’s democratic credentials as one reason why Arunachalis would never want to live under the Chinese. Ironically, it’s this very democracy which is playing havoc with the Arunachalis. Alleges Bamang Tago, who has been fighting the planned power projects in the Dibang valley, “Just look at the statistics. Over 30 MoUs of the 103 power projects were signed in the five months preceding the 2009 Lok Sabha elections. That means the funds for the elections came from the MoUs.”

 
 
In Arunachal’s borderdistricts, the Airtel signal on your cellphone pops up from towers on the Chinese side.
 
 
With big boys like the Jindals and Reliance rushing into Arunachal, rules for securing mandatory clearances for power projects have been bent with impunity. Says Neeraj Vagholikar, who is with ngo Kalpavriksh and who has worked in the region for the last eight years, “Public consultation and green clearances have been reduced to a farcical cosmetic exercise as project developers have already paid huge ‘upfront premiums’ at the time of signing agreements (MoUs) with the Arunachal Pradesh government.” The ‘upfront premium’ is the one per cent of the total project cost that the developer deposits with the government even before mandatory clearances are obtained. For a region that insists on all Indian citizens securing an inner line permit to enter the state, such a development paradigm is fraught with grave consequences.

All this has alienated Arunachalis from India. They believe they have been exploited and neglected, their tribal identity deliberately diluted. Lack of development has begun to agitate them because they have woken to the possibilities, illustrated by what China’s achieved across the McMahon Line. Democracy and freedom are India’s advantage over China. But as Dai points out, “With democracy playing havoc with Arunachal Pradesh, there’s a murmur in our society asking: wouldn’t we be better off under Chinese rule?”

Arunachal pradesh
The Centre may put up a show of good intention, but it seldom comes to any sort of fruition
Outlook
tawang
China’s stand on Tawang lies inextricably close to its suspicions of India’s intentions on Tibet. Therein lies the rub....
Pranay Sharma
opinion
Let there be no war. Let bhai-bhai one-upmanship last forever.
Mohan Guruswamy
the india complex
Is it paranoia or just plain old envy because China has surged far ahead of us in every field?
Pranay Sharma
china eye view
The Indian media reserves its vitriol for China. It’s horribly unfair.
Wang Yaodong
bilateral trade
Trade is growing. But a closer look finds India chafing at inequalities.
Lola Nayar
Column
A stronger India must counter China with open-minded caution
K.S. Bajpai
Tawang
 
Daily MailPublished
COLLAPSE COMMENTS :
HAVE YOUR SAY
Nov 19, 2009 02:23 AM
41
"On The Wrong Side Of Geography" is a wake up call to India's democratic framework. It cannot be denied that Delhi had been committing several blunders by neglecting the North Eastern States since it achieved independence. The seeds of this neglect lie in the years before and after partition when Pandit Nehru and Assam's Congress chief minister, Gopinath Bordoloi meekly gave in to Pakistan's claim for Sylhet which had a deep political and economic relationship with India.

Today mainland India shares a tenuous relationship with Assam and other North Eastern States in geographical terms through the narrow Siliguri corridor. Had Sylhet remained with India this link would have given us greater strategic depth in the Siliguri corridor, improved transport and facilitated greater integration of the North-East to mainland India.
Unfortunately, we continue to ignore history at our peril.

Thanking you,

Mihir K. Datta
Cleveland Heights
Ohio, USA
MIHIR DATTA
Cleveland Heights, United States
Nov 15, 2009 09:36 PM
40
Saikat Datta has very succinctly put forward the views of Arunachali. the reason why China claims Arunachal as part of China has nothing to do with the development across the border; historically Tawang was (culturally & by religion) part of Tibet & MCMahon line was an artificial barrier. If India had quite docilely accepted Tibet as part of China in 1959, they should also accept the claim of China to at least part of Arunachali.e. Tawang and its surroundings. If one has to accept the premises that there is good development of roads & infrastructure in China compared to India, then may be whole of India should be ceded to China. As for the developmental there are constraints of democracy in India - as we in west Bengal who are suffering from the short-sighted politician like Mamata know very well. As for corruption in Arunachal, it is upto the people of the state to get rid of the corrupt. Joining China will not make much of a difference unless Arunachal people accept to share the fate of Uigur rebels that were hanged by the Han Chinese government. Also Tibet of today is a Han colony - that also must be told to them by the likes of Saikat.
Yours sincerely,
Arunava Choudhury
Dr. Arunava Choudhury
Kolkata, India
Nov 14, 2009 11:49 AM
39
Going by all the facts of neglect of Arunachal Pradesh, Nagaland, Sikkim and other states in the north-east, the ruling Govt all these years and the bureaucrats are born fools. By deciding not to antogonise China, have slept all these years and have now trying hard to wake to China's brazen attempts to intimidate India. The moment China invaded India, and then let it go, India should have built its military strength and done other development activities, instead of just conducting elections. India does not have even half the guts that Pak has. Look at Pak, it has provided a safe haven to Al-queda and playing the little bully to perfection. India has reopen Tibet and other issues if it wants to hold on to Tawang. China is not immortal, now that India has the strength and money, it should do a tit-for-tat and keep China guessing, instead of retorting to China.
Paul Deepak
Chennai, India
Nov 13, 2009 07:06 AM
38
As long as the Indian Politicians do not realize that key to integration is corruption-free development of the society; wounds in North East or for that matter anywhere else in the country would never heal.Its not that money is not allocated to these states but the leaders supposed to put them to constructive use cannibalize ninety percent of the funds. In addition, strong regional identities must be made a part of national school curriculum to foster faster assimilation into the mainstream.
Navien K Batta
muscat, Oman
Nov 12, 2009 09:08 PM
37
Even though I agree that development has not taken place in north eastern states, but the whole notion of preserving tribal identity has also been a reason for it. The question is how can government foster development of infrastructure without diluting tribal identity as it currently stands. I do not think it is actually possible. People on both sides must be ready to compromise. A great example is China, where tribal identities cease to exist (just look at the cover picture with no people in it) at the cost of better roads. There is so much about preserving tribal identity, I really wonder people in those areas love living in deprived conditions or born into it. For these matters this article does not help anybody. What we should rather wonder how can we get a middle ground between the top and bottom pictures. What compromises about tribal identity as a nation do we have to make? For example off course there will be citizens of India from elsewhere in India who would live in Arunachal when they work there by buying land like the tribals when they get the monetary power can buy land in any other parts of India. Homogenization unfortunately comes as the baggage of development in the western sense. At least that is the notion of development;e.g. better road, schools, medical facilities being talked about in this forum.
So instead of fighting homogenization, we ought to make an effort in identifying what we can preserve about tribal identity and what we cannot and be at peace with it. Easier said than done! As a cautionary not if you try to preserve your cultural identity at the cost of infrasturctural projects in China, you can land up in jail or dead. Look at Uighurs and Tibetans for example
Arpan Banerjee
durgapur, India
Nov 12, 2009 05:45 PM
36
---
The article made me wonder if Mr. Datta had dreamt up the headline first and then gone looking for the story.
-----
Welcome to the Outlook school of journalism my friend.
Rajeev
Delhi, India
Nov 12, 2009 10:43 AM
35
The article made me wonder if Mr. Datta had dreamt up the headline first and then gone looking for the story. If, in spite of having managed to converse with some of our most thoughtful representatives, his grand conclusion is that Arunachalis are wondering if they are ‘on the wrong side of geography’, then he needs to check his interview notes again. Had he paid more attention to what his interviewees were saying, he would have realized that Delhi is not Arunachal’s biggest problem today – maybe the second biggest at most. Its biggest problems are its politicians and polity.

As for “(T)he war had left behind a people who’d remember those months for generations to come.” For generations to come? Spare me the hyperbole. Maybe my grandparents reminisce about it once in a while (mainly because in the hullabaloo, all their livestock got stolen); as for the rest of us, we don’t even think about it. China didn’t even exist in our daily consciousness until recently when it started building dams on the other side and denying visas to Arunachali bureaucrats. Maybe we kid about shifting loyalties to China among ourselves especially when we are sick of explaining India’s geography and diversity to other Indians, but no one, really no one, in her sane mind is seriously considering that as an option.

To be fair, he has managed to get the scattered facts correct - about the electoral corruption, about the environmental concerns, about Hindi being the lingua franca (but with 50+ dialects with an average speaker size of 6-7000 or even less, perhaps it was the least hegemonic option), out of which he could have teased out the more difficult points about societies in transition, of the hard choices between ‘development’ and its environmental costs, of negotiating modern democracy on the crutches of clan and tribal affiliations. But alienation? Wow. That’s a heroic leap of imagination.

No, seriously, the Arunachalis are not alienated. Not yet. But if this nonsense is what Outlook chooses to publish instead of covering the recent dharna held by the All Arunachal Pradesh Students’ Union in Delhi pledging Arunachal’s allegiance to India, which incidentally was similarly ignored by all major newspapers and channels, alienation is an alternative.

What a missed opportunity, Mr. Datta. And no thanks for leaving me to field the coming onslaught of questions like ‘is it true that Arunachalis are planning to welcome the Chinese with open arms? It was in the Outlook.’

p.s. 1962 wasn’t so much ‘the end of innocence’ (the ‘noble savage’ drivel is so last century) as the end of the Elwin-Nehru experiment with NEFA. To me, that was the greatest loss of ’62.
nangki
Delhi, India
Nov 12, 2009 03:14 AM
34
Lets accept that North eastern states are being continuously neglected and probably kept out of media since politicians have very little benefits out of them. Lets accept even we are responsible for not making an attempt to know more about the happenings in that part of our country... If that scale of Ignorance happens in any other state there will be riots, so one would really wonder how did these states stayed with India so long.
But on the other hand China is bloody no democracy. One day we know Arunachal pradesh goes to China and next day Chinese state government will mobilize all the population to be enslaved in one of their SEZ's
Its better for them to be with India... but country has always neglected them and it is a hard truth to swallow.
Abhijit
Oxford, United States
Nov 12, 2009 01:21 AM
33
Now it is Arunachal Pradesh tomorrow they say mumbai is belong to them.Days are not foraway for china that it will break like Soviet Union then only the world will be free from them.
balaji
Chennai, India
Nov 11, 2009 04:48 PM
32
MR,

For us, the shortest route to North-East is by crossing Bangladesh. We cannot neglect Bangladesh when considering India's interests in North-East. In fact, Bangladesh needs to be forced to accept the suzerainty of India over it's territory. This action should have been taken long ago; considering that Bangladesh lies within the Indian territory, it affects Indian interests in many ways. Indian government need to give opportunity to the North-Eastern people, to trade with south-east asian nations like Myanmar, Thailand.

The local people of North-East have every right to preserve their culture, and if required, they need to use arms. But it will not change the minds of those Bangladeshis wanting to migrate. Nor will it change, if the Chinese occupy North-East and use military force.
vikram chandra
Visakhapatnam, India
Nov 11, 2009 04:19 PM
31
MR,

Buddhists of Sri Lanka have undermined the people of their nation who are Hindu. There is hardly a common ground between Buddhists and Hindus as far as geo-politics is concerned. I do not think there will ever be a India-China alliance based on Hinduism and Buddhism.

You claim that supporting China's interests as far as Tawang is concerned, will act as a bulwark against Islamists from Bangladesh. These Islamists are mostly poor people and what is so wrong about they migrating to North-East, as long as it is a Indian controlled territory. When China cannot go to a war with India over these provinces, will the poor Bangladeshi Islamists dare to? Is USA able to stop inflow of Mexicans across it's borders, with it's fenced borders and well-equipped patrol teams? I seriously think the Bangladeshis fear the ocean more than Indian or Chinese military.
vikram chandra
Visakhapatnam, India
Nov 11, 2009 03:40 PM
30
Perhaps, The Indian government wants to keep the Arunachal Pradeshi's to themselves, and also introduce democracy, within their social framework. The people of Arunachal Pradesh should be asked, what they desire out of their daily existence and what they desire from their live's. Building a consensus the government should then chart out policies for the people.Why is the state government of Arunachal Pradesh, not held accountable for the development of Arunachal Pradesh, if there is no Presidents Rule in Arunachal Pradesh?
Aditya Mookerjee
Belgaum, India
Nov 11, 2009 01:46 AM
29
A nice article, though it suffers from muddled and convulated thinking at some places.

1. The author talks about lack of development in Arunachal Pradesh in the same breadth as he talks about influx of new projects while describing the development across the border in Tibet. It is surprising that he does not see any irony in these statements. Problem is that development and new projects can never be mutually exclusive. One needs to accept change in order to enjoy the fruits of 'economic development'

2. It is claimed that people from Arunachal Pradesh feel resentment because of dilution of tribal identity on account of imposition of Hindi. It would have been good to add that there was no common language among different tribes and Hindi serves as a bridge language. Chinese has been imposed on Tibetians even when they have a common language. That is the difference.

It is the nature of rapid change in Arunachal society that causes adjustment problems and heigtens the sense of identity. All societies with rapid changes face these problems. It would be been good if the author placed his narrative in perspective and considered people's reaction to rapid pace of change over which they have little or no control.
maneesh
College Station, U.S. Minor Outlying Islands
Nov 11, 2009 12:14 AM
28
First Hizda Manmohan and then the Italian Congress, kick them out of power as soon as possible. This is the remedy for all problems
M. Srinivasulu
Hyderabad, India
Nov 10, 2009 03:17 PM
27
In oue country, only Delhi matters. All else is the periphery, or the "backwaters." That is why Arunachal -- and all the other regions are neglacted. That is why the Indian government is not able to respond to Pakistani or Chinese threats, so happy are our politicians to live in their cocoons.
Today Arunacha, tomorrow the North-East, and then naxalites. All are symptoms of the Delhi disease.
Dinesh Kumar
Chandigarh, India
Nov 10, 2009 03:20 AM
26
The alternative to China for for Arunachal and the other North-Eastern Indian states is NOT Indian democracy.

It is Bangladeshi Islamist domination and extermination of non-Muslims. Look what happened to the Buddhist tribes of the Chittaging Hill Tracts in Bangladesh!

The Indians bring Bangladeshi Muslim hordes with them -both because they are too lazy and inefficient and corrupt to be able to keep them out, and because the Congress Party uses these illegals as an easy vote bank.

Indian offers only Islamisation to the North-East peoples.
Momeen Rashid
Delhi, India
Nov 10, 2009 03:14 AM
25
RAJEEV:

To be absolutely frank, if the North-east people care about their future, they have good reason to pray for their area to be conquered by China.

What is the alternative?

It is not, in the long run, Indian rule or Hindi-speaking migrants taking over.

It is take over by the flood of Muslim Bangladeshis.

At least Tibet is safe from Bangladeshi colonisation thanks to China.....

Ever thought of that?
Momeen Rashid
Delhi, India
Nov 10, 2009 02:17 AM
24
“People of our age now speak to each other in Hindi, our second language, because it was taught for years in our schools, while our ancient tribal languages were forgotten. New Delhi never bothered to understand or value our culture. Now, we seem to be getting lost in the deluge.”

-Everywhere the imposition of Hindi is leading to frustration and Hindi has become more of threat to national integration. It is time the govt understands this and gives priority to local languages.
shaan
London, United Kingdom
Nov 10, 2009 02:08 AM
23
It's amazing how many people in this forum hold democracy responsible for various problems Indians are facing right now.
India's problems are governance problems that have got nothing to do with N ehru, or Congress or the BJP being in power. Saikat Dutta's sensational peace fails to point out that many other parts of India also deal with the same issues of pathetic infrastructure, poor law and order situation and the like. A massive administrative reform is needed to change all this. Don't forget that crores of rupees earmarked for development assistance often are not spent because of lack of timely implementation. This is even worse than siphonic off the public assistance money by the politicians, government officials and the middle men.
Even if India were to become a dictatorship these problems of governance would not disappear without administrative reforma. Moreover, in a highly complex multi-ethnic, multi-lingual, multi- religious , multi-cultural society like India's democracy is still the binding force and the best compromise among its diverse citizenry. And democracy also is the only power of the poor and weak citizenry to pull down those who are not ruling the nation or the states up to the expectation of the citizens. Don't forget that democratic politics also gives a chance to people to vent out their expressions and oppositions to the state's action.
I do agree that India is years away from the development needs because of the inefficiency of the governments at centre and at the states. But we will live in a fool's paradise if we believe that Chinese style of dictatorship that kills all dissenting views is better equipped than democracy to resolve India's governance issues.
DC
NEW YORK, United States
Nov 10, 2009 12:44 AM
22
China lacks good sense, as can be seen from the utterances of their leaders. What India lacks in aggression, it more than makes up for it through good sense. China's only competition in the world is poor India. They do not even realize this simple fact and will not until it hits them on their face. India is a long-term contender. We do not know to make cheap toys, fake drugs and other products that do not meet international standards. China is in a hurry, and greatness is never achieved by nations that are in a hurry. Those are deemed to fail. The only redeeming thing coming out of China is it's hard working people. But they are a fodder to the state.
vikram chandra
Visakhapatnam, India
Nov 09, 2009 08:59 PM
21
---
Flashpoint 5 Hydel projects will lead to influx of migrants and hasty environmental
clearances will wreak havoc
----
We hear the Chinese have trains running to Tibet. Here, we can’t even build roads.”
-----
The reason the people in the north east do not want railways lines is that the people from other parts of India will flood the state.
Try looking up the history of the opposition in the 1980s during the anti-foreigner's agitation to the proposed railway line to Byrnihat in Meghalaya from Azara in Assam. Only in the recent past has there been some enthusiasm for the proposed line.
Rajeev
Delhi, India
Nov 09, 2009 06:21 PM
20
Aaaah KitKat Dutta and his popcorn journalism.
Rajeev
Delhi, India
Nov 09, 2009 04:43 PM
19
it is not india who duped arunchalis. it is the congress party which governed india for 50 bloody years. every single insurgency, be it kashmir, paunjab, assam etc is direct resultmof congress misrule. and now the congress is led by a christian fanatic sonia whose main aim is to convert india into a vatican state.
namo4
London, United Kingdom
Nov 09, 2009 10:51 AM
18
arunachalis are not well off with india?

and yet over 70% turned up for voting in the elections?

arunachal's election manipulation is no different from any part of india - or even the world. that is the way democracy works.

and the pictures at the top too say something : indians might not be using modern machinery. but they use more people which gives them employment and a livelyhood.

without freedom who wants "development"?

with desis like the author, no wonder india has been intellectually/psychologically subverted in mis-handling chinese hostilities.
nandakumar
chennai, india
Nov 09, 2009 09:11 AM
17
Dear Mr.Saikia,

1)Though your comments are valid please remember the Chinese have decimated Tibetan culture and swamped Tibet with Han Chinese majority.

2)China mirrors Nazi Germany in many respects and development in China is at cost of lives of thousands of minorities.Money power of Chinese is blinding many eminent analysts such as yourself and only good news from China is glossed over and in China itself dissent is never tolerated. What about harsh and barbaric treatment of Tibetans, Uighurs and other minorities in China? Why do you ignore the pollution and environmental degradation in China????

3)It is totally bizarre and utter nonsense to compare Indian democracy with Chinese autocracy. Tawang and entire Arunachal Pradesh is sovereign Indian territory.Without Arunachal and Kashmir and other vital border states, India cannot be complete.

4)PM Manomohan SIngh has done a great service to the nation by announcing development package and all Indians must put pressure on Congress Government at state and centre to see its benefits reach the common man of Arunachal.

So not forget that Aruachalis Pradesh are Indians and have demonstrated love for India time and again.Yes they deserve development and much better from rulers in Delhi and Itanagar.

Finally to all critics of Idnia and as Mr.Vinod Nehta Editor knows for all its ills Indian democracy allows even the smallest individual to voice his/her concern freely and for which in China you could be thrown in jail or worst beheaded.

Jai Hind
BharatMaata Ki Jai
Ram
Singapore, Singapore
Nov 09, 2009 04:50 AM
16
HI MOMEEN RASHID

I have to agree with your comment- China may collapse in the long run. Chinese totalitarian regime will collapse because history is any guide no totalitarian or dictatorship has lasted long.

On the other hand India will survive because of her democratic moorings. Moreover, Indian citizenry are masters who in turn can vote in or vote out a government as they please-the kind of release of exaltation or frustrations as the case may be. Whereas, under the totalitarian rule, the anger and frustrations of the citizenry are bottled up and simmering- ready to burst. When it bursts like a volcano, there will be total destruction in its path. The totalitarian regime is on borrowed time for the judgement day.

Unlike totalitarian system, a democratic system cannot be 'force marched' in a particular direction by railroading peoples’ democratic rights. In such a system it will be slow, cumbersome for the desired outcomes-like faster economic growth. India is progressing on a snail phase like the tortoise of the proverbial tale that won the race in the end.

I can wager on my bottom dollar that the Chinese citizenry would prefer freedom because yearning to be free is inherent in all of us- human beings and animals.
Scaria Varghese
Melbourne, Australia
Nov 08, 2009 10:11 PM
15
Saikat Datta wants us to believe that Tibetans are grateful to the Chinese for occupying their country. Without occupation probably Tibet would have economic progress. But what is the price? Their very identity. Tibet is overwhelmed by the Chinese, so are other ethnic minority regions.

Infrastructure may be in shamble in Arunachal Pradesh, but it is no different from the rest of country. Does it mean that everyone should look up to Beijing for development? According to Datta's world, soon Assam and whole northeast will yearn for Chinese rule. Bengalis already believe that they are a Chinese province.
Rajesh
Phoenix, United States
Nov 08, 2009 09:40 PM
14
SCARIA:

India is a lost cause.

It is the country with wretched performance which uses its being a democracy as the ever-ready excuse for failure to perform.

This is, simply, suicidal.

Now it is involved in a confrontation with China, a far more efficient nation, with far greater resources. China may collapse in the long run. But that won't be much consolation if India doesn't exist by then.

India can survive the contest with China only by being far more competitive,efficient economically, and able to mobilise its population everywhere for the struggle. In the North-east, particularly, it has abjectly failed in doing so.
Momeen Rashid
Delhi, India
Nov 08, 2009 10:02 AM
13
What load of hogwash! Some of my fellow bloggers’ gibberish in black and white form is utter bunkum. Didn’t the Arunachal Pradesh’s denizens recently elected a state government with an overwhelming majority? There was no dissent or call for boycott of the election. People, by and large, exercised their democratic rights and elected a state government of their choice. The key word is choice and the People of Arunachal Pradesh have the choice that approximates democratic rights-freedom of expression, freedom of speech, freedom of religion and all the other mundane democratic rights. If you think everything is hunky-dory in totalitarian China, would you like to live there? Here you take your democratic rights for granted and if you do there, you would be lucky to be alive. Big Brother is watching on your every movement and you will be on the spotlight all the time. People of Arunachal Pradesh must be aware of this, even though their state hasn’t developed the way they would have liked.

Yearning to be free is inherent in all of us- human beings and animals. That can’t be suppressed in perpetuity; it will come back to bite the totalitarian regime sooner or later. The question: what form will that be? Will it be like the fate of the Romanian totalitarian dictator Nicolae Ceauaescu?

Here the democracy has the advantage: the citizenry are the masters, who in turn can vote in or vote out a government as they please-the kind of release of exaltation or frustrations as the case may be. Whereas, under the totalitarian rule, the anger and frustrations of the citizenry are bottled up and simmering- ready to burst. When it bursts like a volcano, there will be total destruction in its path. The totalitarian regime is on borrowed time for the judgement day.
Scaria Varghese
Melbourne, Australia
Nov 08, 2009 09:50 AM
12
It’s not just Arunachal Pradesh. Ask the average inhabitant of any North East Indian state what India has done for this part of the country. The average ultra-patriotic India hyperventilates with indignation at the thought of China claiming Tawang yet can’t even name the states or Union territories the country has, and can’t locate Arunachal Pradesh on the map to save his life. Hell, and I’m not exaggerating when I say this, there are “educated” Indians who would be hard put to find India on the outline map of the world. India treats the North east like a miser who, very occasionally, remembers a piece of gold he has hidden in a hole but will neither spend it nor give it to someone who can use it.

The average North East India sees that the most India has done for him is benign neglect, that is, if one is lucky enough to live in a “peaceful” part; without schools, hospitals, power or water, living as his ancestors did a hundred years ago. He might have a government of indolent and corrupt stooges placed over him, whose only purpose in life is to batten on Central government doles which are little more than bribes to stay peaceful. He will know how the Central government has cut off access to the North-East’s natural markets in South East Asia and compels it to “compete” with “mainland” India which doesn’t bother to remember its existence.

If he happens to live in Manipur, parts of Assam, or Nagaland, he will have a much sharper appreciation of Indian “democracy” where a non-commissioned securityman can shoot him dead, quite legally, without a question being asked. It happens just about every day.

Please don’t compare the situation in North East India to that in Delhi or Mumbai. We have our own reality here, and, frankly, given the choice of living under Chinese “tyranny” or Indian “benevolence”, I think most of us would be better off under the former.
Biswapriya Purkayastha
Shillong, India
Nov 08, 2009 06:42 AM
11
First 1984, then Arundhati Roy's poison pen and now Arunachal. What is Outlook trying to prove.
Anil Kotwal
Adelaide,, Australia
Nov 08, 2009 01:16 AM
10
rom entering the state (the few who did, needed a permit), for fear of offending his Chinni-bhais Mao $ Chou, who in turn, repaid his great efforts in full measure in '62.......

are you sure,he fingered the chinese repeatedlyand when they retaliated to his forward policy,he played victim in front of his countrymen.accusing china of backstabbing and treachery,
there are some hard questions here,why the boundary is still a bone of contention,what is the future of indo-china relationship?
given their actions l;ately in ladakh and elsewhere,they are in a no-nonsensical mood.
Bazeed Mirza
Edinburgh, United Kingdom
Nov 08, 2009 12:20 AM
9
Dictatorial regimes can be efficient in implementing development programs. Democracies may be slow, often bogged down by debates, bureaucratic red tapes and corruption. People may complain of negelct, but it is most unlikely that they would opt to live in a dictatorial country. That however does not absolve us from the need to pay attention to development as well as to cultural sensitivities.
Anwaar
Dallas, United States
Nov 07, 2009 11:19 PM
8
The blame for this mess lie with the stupid, naive idiot Nehru. He not only refused to allow any development in Arunachal, but even Indian citizens were debarred from entering the state (the few who did, needed a permit), for fear of offending his Chinni-bhais Mao $ Chou, who in turn, repaid his great efforts in full measure in '62.
His venal Congress Party continued the same stupid policies for years- even today, Indians from outside the state must still register when they enter the state.
Worse, instead of the Home Ministry handling matters concerning the state, it's the External Affairs Ministry. What message does that send to the Mandarins?
Fifty uninterrupted years of corrupt, bankrupt Congress Raj- their criminal neglect is shocking, yet the stupid idiot masses keep voting these criminals to power.
Had it not been for the IMF, India may still be where it was in the 80's- no reforms and a bankrupted economy under the Congies Commie policies.
The credit for India's progress must go to the NDA govt- it's the BJP-NDA govt policies which finally set the country on its development trajectory- almost everything that people now take for granted was initiated by NDA, as no new reforms or developments has occurred or implemented since under the succeeding useless Congress govt.
Bodh
Springfield, United States
Nov 07, 2009 08:21 PM
7
Is Arunachal really nigleted by Indian government? Those who are grumbling and want to go China side Tibet will they happy there?I was in Tibet in 1997, I went there for Kailas Manssorover Yatra, I spend there 14 days.What I saw there I was shocked.China treated Tebitians justlike slave, sixty years China rulled there what kind progress China made there? 60 years back Tibetians living in extreme poverty same position is there now also.,No schools, no dispensery,nothing only Chineses population is increasing. Are Arunachli want to live in slavery?
Last year I visited Tawang and surrounding area, people are better fad, schools are there, Docters are there,freedom speach is there regular election conducting,Indian government pouring millions of ruppies there if this fund not reaching to common poor man ,who is responsible for that?Why not educated young fight for that. I had seen many youth organations`s posters there, why not educated youth rebel againest political leaders and government servents.Who meet your reporters they are only grumbling weeping and showing their helplessness. I think they are liers or may be cheaters
Ramesh Raghuvanshi
pune, India
Nov 07, 2009 07:15 PM
6
“How about taking the ‘Soil’ of ‘House of Commons’ next time, because there too the modesty of a hapless lady called ‘Goddess of Justice’ - is outraged every moment?”
Rajneesh Batra
New Delhi, India
Nov 07, 2009 06:51 PM
5
I have always wondered whether Delhi is India's capital, or just another North Indian city.

For Arunachalis, it's better that they decide what they want to do with their future. The article is not clear whether they want cities and industries or to preserve their native cultures. On one hand it states that they have been neglected, and on the other hand there is this fear of "invasion".
vikram chandra
Visakhapatnam, India
Nov 07, 2009 06:15 PM
4
The vacuum headed chatterboxes in Delhi often cite 'democractic credentials' as a good reason for people to remain a part of India. Well, democracy and freedom don't feed a hungry populace or provide jobs to the unemployed. China may be a dictatorship with scant respect for human rights, but it ensures that its citizens live a dignified life of high quality. What else does one need, at the end of the day? Is it a surprise that so many of our peple happily flee our free and democratic India to take up jobs in other dictatorships like Saudi Arabia or the other Gulf states, even China?
G.Natrajan
Hyderabad, India
Nov 07, 2009 05:31 PM
3
This neglect that spans a spectrum of geographies and issues within the country is going to be India's undoing. For long the north-east has needed better integrated with the rest of the country by way of better infrastructure, better investment in education and job opportunities. This has not happened despite dire warning signals. A dire lack of these has made the region a good ignition point for fissiparous tendencies. Yet, Delhi is lost in its own problems thus turning a blind eye to some serious issues across the country (population explosion being just one of them). When Delhi will wake up to real governance, will decide whether India stays united or whether it will fall victim to its own myopia.
C K Jaidev
Dubai, UAE
Nov 07, 2009 04:10 PM
2
It's an ill timed rather ordinary article playing with the emotion of people of Arunachal Pradesh.This type of article creats confusion in mind of different ethinic groups in India for no reason.The problem of development is not limited to Arunachal but is omnipresent in whole of country except Metro.Myself coming from Bihar, where the facilities are well known.But no one will write that Bihar has been colonised by New Delhi.But it will be different if any problem in J&K, or Assam or Manipur or even Tamil Nadu.For these type of Journalist only Hindi speaking area is India and rest are 'colonies' of New Delhi.sic!
Secondly, if the writer thinks that Arunachalis thinks , they would have been better with China then I suppose, author would have been repenting to have our independence as for him it would have been better had he still be an British subject.
Those who only thinks of physical prosperity and compare themselves with their chinese counterpart should talk to His Highness Dalai Lama and others about the liberty they enjoyed in Democratic India.
Having said so, I don't mean that everything in India is good.Corruption is definetely one of them and needs some serious remedies, but is it limited to these areas only or is omnipresent?
So, instead of passing such sensational statement in reputed national weekly as Arunachalis prefer China to India, think twice.
Mr Datta, don't go Ms Arundhati Roy, who always find faults in India and abuses the country.Everyone should try to understand democracy does not give you limitless privilege of infective verbal diarrheoa, which could be dangerous to everyone, including the one who spreads it.
My sincere apology for my hard thoughts, but our Country is much better than it is being projected by few intellectuals in this magazine.
Indian
Perth, Australia
Nov 07, 2009 01:47 PM
1
The Indian political system is too CORRUPT and the Congress too full of MALE-HATRED, to bother with the fact whether AP belongs to India or China. God save India!
Partha persistent spammer
chennai, India
COLLAPSE COMMENTS   
Post a Comment
You are not logged in, please log in or register
ABOUT US | CONTACT US | SUBSCRIBE | ADVERTISING RATES | COPYRIGHT & DISCLAIMER | COMMENTS POLICY