Illustration by Sorit
opinion
To Let / For Sale?
Legalising prostitution is not the answer. Nab the traffickers.

When a problem is big and tends to profit a powerful group, there’s a time-honoured temptation to sweep it under the rug by assuming it’s natural and inevitable. This was true of slavery until the abolitionist movement of the 19th century, and of colonialism until the contagion of independence movements in the 20th century. Now these same forces are at work in attitudes toward the global and national realities of sex slavery.

The biggest normaliser of profiteering from the rental, sale and invasion of human bodies is the idea that it is too big to fight, that it has always existed, and that it can be swept under the rug by legalising and just accepting it. Those who profit—in this case, the global network of sex traffickers, sex tourism operators and brothel owners—are the major force behind the argument to legalise and increase profits that already rival those from the global arms and drug trade.

What will diminish and end this injustice? Exposing its reality: the lack of alternatives for those who are prostituted; the addiction and inability to empathise among those who create the demand, and the disastrous results wherever the selling or renting of human beings for sexual purposes has been legalised and normalised.

In Australia and the Netherlands where prostitution has been legalised, for instance, trafficking and the harms that come with it have only increased. In Victoria, Australia, it not only allowed legal brothels to proliferate, but illegal brothels increased by 300 per cent in a year. A hospitable environment for sex tourists and other buyers drove up demand local women and girls had too many alternatives to becoming the supply, they had to be trafficked from Southeast Asia.

The same is true of Amsterdam where trafficked East European and North African girls outnumber Dutch citizens in brothels. The mayor of Amsterdam reports that the red-light district has become a centre for illegal immigration and money laundering. In Germany and in an area near Las Vegas where prostitution has been legalised, government agencies tried to make applicants for unemployment benefits show they had attempted to find ‘work’ in the so-called ‘hospitality industry’ of prostitution in order to become eligible for such benefits. This was only defeated by massive organising by women’s movements.

In the few countries that have legalised prostitution—with the idea that it would reduce harm to prostituted women, as is now being argued by some in India—rates of assault and rape against the prostituted have not dropped.  There is also no corroborated evidence that legalisation increases the use of condoms or women’s power to demand such use. On the contrary, an official emphasis on condoms has often made it possible for brothels to demand more money for unprotected sex, while also causing them to conceal the number of prostituted women and children who have lost their lives to AIDS.

In Calcutta, a group of women who had asked for the unionisation of prostitution to guarantee workers’ rights  admitted to facing violence when they’re alone with the client. “They paid for it, we cannot stop it.” A doctor working for this group said he left after having to stitch up the vagina of a fifteen-year-old Nepali girl—for the third time. 
But there is some good news. It comes from countries where traffickers have been pursued, and prostituted women and children have been given services and alternatives. Sweden has gone after traffickers and pimps, confiscated their illegal assets, and made them compensate for damages while also decriminalising and offering services to prostituted women and children. By imposing penalties on those who create the demand and providing ‘John schools’ that address their addiction to dominance, they diminish the problem itself.

The result has been a significant decrease in sex trafficking and the commodification of sex. In ’99, it was estimated that 1,25,000 Swedish men bought about 2,500 prostituted women one or more times per year, before the law came into force. By ’02, this figure had fallen to no more than 1,500 women. The only truly effective way to curb trafficking is to see it for what it is, an outrage to human rights; one that can diminish, just as labour slavery and colonialism have come to do. Prostitution has not existed in all societies: it is a function of the inequality of women and the equation of masculinity with domination. All men in the present are not dependent on prostitution.

Commodification of human beings creates a separate class  of people whose bodies can be rented or sold—the very opposite of the universal protection of human dignity enshrined in the body of the Indian constitution.


(The author is the founder and president of Apne Aap Women Worldwide, an anti-trafficking organisation.)

Translate into:
 
Daily MailPublished
COLLAPSE COMMENTS :
HAVE YOUR SAY
Dec 29, 2009 03:38 AM
17
I would like to draw attention to Julian's comment below because the writer is correct that the picture heading this article is racist. Racisim fills this debate and it is rarely recognized. In India it is often implied that criminalizing the demand might be ok for those people in Sweden, but it would be impossible to ask uncivilized Indian men to live without prostituted sex. Racism surfaces again when supporters of legalization in North America and Europe suggest that "high end" prostitution is not the same as some other kind that is not purchased by rich white men. Race is part of this debate and it would do us well to recognize it.
Whitney.LRuss@gmail.com
New Delhi, India
Dec 28, 2009 10:40 PM
16
peace2047
Chennai, India

Good suggestions, but how far it is practicable?

Education and Employement.
When educated men are not getting a job, who will go for a female.?
If it is a widow with children , who will look after children, if the mother works?
ahmad pasha
long island, United States
Dec 28, 2009 12:57 PM
15
The institution of male or female prostitution and shame of female trafficking can be made history if there is a strategy and will to implement it. If there are adequate and sure deterrence for the offenders, this crime against humanity will not take place. Similarly, if there is not a need for prostitutes, there will not be prostitution. This may look idealistic, but everyone has to work towards it. Institution of marriage, family and practice of celibacy can bring this state. It is the responsibility of the society to educate men and women about life, family and higher means of experiencing happiness. It should also support them through the right means to satisfy the natural sexual needs.

Employment and helping all human to find a suitable partner in life is the means to achieve it. Adolescents, widows, widowers and others should be taken care of by the society. The habit of self restraining and channeling the mind in progressive and interesting work will help humans to enjoy life and also not cause harm to anyone else. Art, literature, dance, music, tourism, sports, adventure, spirituality and many other similar activities will provide necessary avenues for enjoyment.

Women who are currently caught in the web of prostitution need to be rehabilitated. Suitable institutional setup need to be made to help them start a life of their choice, these efforts are already on, as done by Apne Aap. Society’s outlook needs to changed, it will take time and only a patient effort can bring the result. Stricter enforcement of laws, active citizen participation and vigilant media can only bring an end to this shame on humanity.

World cannot see happiness or peace without women being given the dignity they deserve.
peace2047
Chennai, India
Dec 27, 2009 09:24 PM
14
Why do men have to rent human beings in order to have sex? Ever hear of "going solo"? The assumption that women and girls have to be used for men to have "sex" is ridiculous. Males take care of themselves without paying for it when they are adolescents, right? So adult men won't die without prostitution. But a lot less women will suffer. This assumes people care about women suffering more than men having access to girls and women.

All pimping and procuring and trafficking should be criminalised, and boys, girls, and women who are being trafficked, pimped, and procured should not be criminalised, which is a very different approach than legalising prostition. Sweden did this and prostitution went down by 75%. Do you really think Swedish men are "suffering" because of this? No, they are not. They simply aren't using women as things to ejaculate into and on. This is a human rights issue, not a moral one.

Any man--especially you, Partha--above who has stated that prostitution should be legal, you get paid to have yourself be ejaculated on and in for one month, daily, by many men each day--men who think of you as a thing to be used and abused, and then tell me you want that to be legal.

Finally, anti-Black racism of the image used to introduce this piece is ridiculous. Black hands coming at a white woman? Most violence in the West is done by white men against women of all colors, when you combine interpersonal and institutional violence. Are most of the women and girls being trafficked in prostitution in India, white? I doubt it.
Julian
New York City, United States
Dec 27, 2009 05:41 AM
13
In reading these comments I see several themes emerging that do not make sense to me.

1) "A poor country like India will always have lots of poor women flooding the brothels and the demand for prostituted sex cannot meet this supply." If this were true, there would be no trafficking industry. There would be no mafia-like structure making crores from the kidnapping, trafficking, and selling of young girls into brothels to meet the demand. The very existence of international trafficking suggests that no where in the world does the supply excede the demand, India included.

2) "Erradicating prostitution forces religious morality on women." Prostituted women are beaten, raped, kidnapped, coerced, infected, and killed as a regular part of the job. I reaquainted myself with atheism, humanism, and even satanism for the purpose of this post and found all would agree that such treatment of people is wrong (even in the absence of God's opinion). These are the wrongs the author refers to and I see no connection to whether or not God wants humans to have sex with each other.

3) "Trafficking is wrong but prostitution is not." This idea must come from the notion that there are women prostituted freely and of their own volition. First, making a choice between prostitution and death is not a choice. However let's take the United States as an example where the average person never makes choices between death and one alternative. We know that women (including Indian women) are trafficked to the United States. Lesser known, however, is that 90% of prostituted women in the United States are sold by a pimp. (This includes women sold within legal brothels in the state of Nevada.) The average age for a woman to first be prostituted in the United States is 13 while the age that she can legally consent to sex is 16-18 depending on the state. The entrepreneur woman who freely chooses prostitution from a range of options and who sells herself without being sold by a pimp or trafficker is exceptionally rare in the world if she exists at all. Trafficking exists because prostitution does and we seem to be clinging to prostitution without realizing what it is like. I agree with the author that eliminating prostitution by criminalizing the demad would be a small price to pay for a world where women and girls do not have to fear being trafficked.
Whitney.LRuss@gmail.com
New Delhi, India
Dec 22, 2009 04:42 PM
12
SEX TRAFIKKING

Sex trafikking can not be stoppped.
In a poor country like India,the supply will be more than the demand. Women will voluntarily go into it, rather than being kidnapped and sold.
But it will be opening up of the flood gates of moral corruption. It will be a death blow to the family life.
Men instead of spending the money on family , taking care of elderly parents, wife and children, will spend it on liquors and prostitutes.
ahmad pasha
long island, United States
Dec 22, 2009 03:39 PM
11
Whe milk can be bought in the market, why buy a cow?

Is sex only for enjoyement?

Like the human body which is made of innumerable cells, the society is made up of units called families. It is the law of the nature that as one geenration grows older and dies, another geenration has to replace it.

So, if sex is delinked with commitment to have a family life, the days of such a soiety are numbered.
ahmad pasha
long island, United States
Dec 22, 2009 10:45 AM
10
Neither I owns a brothel, nor do I run a sex industry; yet I support legalisation of prostitution.
Hard for me to understand what is writer's demand, stop trafficking, abuse, etc; or stop prostitution altogether?

The writer put them cunningly (or ignorantly) together, but "To Let" and "For Sale" are fundamentally different. The difference of ownership.

The argument of the writer is flawed, as nicely put by
ANBanerjee, Newcastle, United Kingdom;
"Comparison to slavery is appropiate only to the point
on the ownership of labour. Banning slavery did not mean banning labour from the fields of virginia."
Bunty
Hsinchu, Taiwan
Dec 21, 2009 11:12 PM
9
Twisting the laws for benefits can always be done.However lets look at the matter from a different point of view,wats more imp ..helping a girl get two square meals of food ,decent education for children or simply high morals?Non proper implementation can be no reason for keeping prostitution illegal
sumeet_trehan
chandigarh, India
Dec 21, 2009 03:19 PM
8
Go to any govt hospital see how much Doctors and nurses are abused. See how much local rikshawwala gets abused.

If the govt wants to ban any profession where abuse happens there will be no profession left in the world.

The point is to have appropiate laws against violence irrespective of profession.

Comparison to slavery is appropiate only to the point
on the ownership of labour. Banning slavery din not mean banning labour from the fields of virginia.
ANBanerjee
Newcastle, United Kingdom
Dec 21, 2009 07:20 AM
7
There is no need for anyone to take a non-existent moral high ground over the issue. whatever stpes governments or people take the issue cannot be wished away or simply made to disappear.Like an enlightened society let us legalise it and get on with life.
Anil Kotwal
Adelaide,, Australia
Dec 21, 2009 04:06 AM
6
"Whether in prostitution or marriage, the male is always the BUYER!"
what partha, you want to sell or what? sell, no. who's stopping you?
somegal
someplace, United States
Dec 21, 2009 04:01 AM
5
"If the authoress had taken the trouble of going to Amsterdam and talking to the authorities there, she would have found out that illegal trafficking in prostitutes has actually come down a lot after it was legalized."

o natarajan uncle, what you went to amsterdam and personally collected data or what? aiyyo what will natarajan aunty think if she heard about this?
somegal
someplace, United States
Dec 20, 2009 05:26 PM
4
You cannot get rid of all the traffickers. As long as there is money to be made, more and more people will join the business. Eliminate one trafficker and ten others will take his place. If the authoress had taken the trouble of going to Amsterdam and talking to the authorities there, she would have found out that illegal trafficking in prostitutes has actually come down a lot after it was legalized. The same is the case with marijuana, which is legal in Amsterdam. Legalization also makes it possible for the government to keep tabs on the number of prostitutes and provide them with legal, medical and rehabilitation facilities, none of which the mafia provides to these poor women. The collective refrain is that if you make it legal you'll take the mafia out of it, and everyone will be better off.
Despite legalization, there will still be some illegals out to make money as it is not a perfect world, but the best thing to do is to legalize it and keep the criminals out.
G.Natrajan
Hyderabad, India
Dec 20, 2009 01:34 PM
3
“The easiest way to lessen any threat is to raise the ‘Danger Mark’.”
Rajneesh Batra
New Delhi, India
Dec 19, 2009 03:42 PM
2
A very sensible article, which actually suggests remidies. Legalizing prostitution did not solve any problems, rather creates new social problems without actually helping the women who need the help most.

Apart from punishing the pimps and brothel owners, they should be publicly shamed.
Malavika
san jose, United States
Dec 19, 2009 03:40 PM
1
Women organisations are ALWAYS looking to increase the PRICE payable for SEX.

While males are starved for sex, except through the HIGHLY EXPENSIVE form of marriage, they have no option as of today, but to pay through their noses, indeed, through their lives! This is because, in our society, the male is by default, the buyer, and the female, the seller of sex. Whether in prostitution or marriage, the male is always the BUYER!

Anti male and anti-gay laws - authored by the British - have been buried at last by a bold Indian High Court. Now, when will TWO other, anti-male laws - also made by the same ancient Church - now be given a burial too?

1.) PORNOGRAPHY : though internet is full of pornography, our convent-school- brainwashed-moral police, punishes pornography! Indian women critics of pornography, still consider it demeaning to their sacred bodies! Will the media support the struggle for better sexual avenues, especially for males, in the 21st century?

2.) ALIMONY : alimony originated in England, because the divorced husband continued to remain the property owner even if divorced, and the wife depended upon him for her sustenance under this ridiculous churchian rule, Therefore, a law for support from the husband arose. In 1867, in the first recorded case of alimony, a Nevada court expanded the concept of alimony pendente lite to assist the wife with travel expenses of witnesses.

Prostitution, like pornography, is cheaper sex for the average male. And therefore, anti-male forces have always found a way to bad mouth it through a friendly media and to ban it.

WAKE UP, MALES! SPEAK UP!
Partha persistent spammer
chennai, India
COLLAPSE COMMENTS   
Post a Comment
You are not logged in, please log in or register
ABOUT US | CONTACT US | SUBSCRIBE | ADVERTISING RATES | COPYRIGHT & DISCLAIMER | COMMENTS POLICY