Nothing underlines the power of celebrity as much as the outpouring of public reaction to Satyamev Jayate, Aamir Khan’s new television show. The issue of sex selection and female infanticide is hardly a new or undocumented one, and stories similar to the heart-rending ones we saw last week have been brought to us before, even on television. And yet, it seemed as if all of urban India awoke to this problem with a startled yelp one Sunday morning, thanks to a TV programme. The kind of attention that the issue received, entirely on account of a star’s backing, seemed to eclipse the years of hard work by activists, journalists and writers, and in a manner that borders on the cruel.
And yet, it would be a mistake to attribute the public response, both good and bad, solely to the presence of a celebrity. For one, if Aamir were to be replaced by another celebrity, the effect would not have been the same. There might be others who might be able to pull it off, but the choice would be determined not by the scale of their fame, but by the nature of their reputation.
More importantly, it is Aamir’s ability to begin with an idea, execute it without compromise, and find ways to make it valuable to the consuming ecosystem that makes his effort so remarkable. In some ways, what works for him is not his celebrity but his obstinacy. Here we have a show that airs across channels, including Doordarshan, at a time slot long abandoned by advertisers and viewers, dealing with subjects far removed from entertainment, dealt with in an unremittingly grim manner, and which ends up being followed by us as if it were a prime-time entertainment show, full of glitz, glamour and East European cheerleaders. The most remarkable thing about Satyamev Jayate is that it takes everything that the market swears is commercial disaster, repackages it and forces the same market to pay obeisance.
Those who criticise the high fees rumoured to be charged by Aamir miss the point altogether, for his ability to make money at commercial rates is precisely what makes this show a true radical breakthrough. It underlines the fact that a real celebrity brand, by which I mean someone who stands for not fame, but a driving idea and belief, and acts accordingly without compromise, can shape the market and bend it to his or her will. Aamir Khan is not a social crusader like a George Clooney, who uses his fame to support a cherished cause, but an entrepreneur who sees social ills as a market that needs to be catered to. He manages to reconcile the mostly incompatible ideas of commercial viability and rarefied cause and restores to the market some notion of social legitimacy.
And unlike others who come from the market, he is able to protect the purity of his idea from what are touted as the deadening compulsions of the market ecosystem. He caters to the market by not pandering to it, but by sensing its unarticulated and barely discernible needs. At a time when the market works hard at flattening out choice and drowning us in sameness, where television channels vie with each other in bringing us versions of the same banality, Aamir’s ability to make this show and command a price for it is proof that the market can operate at a more elevated level, that the current epidemic of sameness is a function not of some inherent mechanism at work, but of its unimaginative use.
That does not mean that the market plays no role at all. The outer limits of possibilities do get defined by the fact that this is, after all, a commercial proposition. Truly contentious issues are unlikely to be covered, and the somewhat spurious and contrived call to action at the end reduces a complex issue to a postcard or sms message that will allegedly change the world is a product of the needs of television and the urge felt by viewers to “do something real”. Also, every issue, no matter how pressing, gets only a week to sort itself out.
And what about bringing about social change? Unlikely, given the nature of the problems we are talking about. Of course, the show might well heighten awareness, enable the efforts of those doing real work at the ground level, and get the issue out of the denial closet, where it is currently ensconced. But it is a little unrealistic to expect a film star and a TV show to change the world. Even on Twitter, that touchstone of the terminally excitable, the show trended only for a single day. Satyamev Jayate is a television show and a powerful one at that, but it will not make us better people. What it might do is help the market finds its better self.
(Adman and social commentator Santosh Desai is author of Mother Pious Lady: Making Sense of Everyday India)
I see no harm in someone using their marketing skills not only to earn a fat cheque but also to do some decent social work in the bargain (A Case of Bazaar Piety). Others too have tried the same, Aamir is just better than them at making money. Shahrukh, for instance, took up the cleaning of Mumbai but didn’t succeed like Aamir. Rakhi Sawant too was seen doing social work with computers for prisoners.
Rishi Vyas, Palampur
It’s too early to say about the success of Aamir’s show. I feel the media has lavished too much praise on it, without taking a feedback from the audience. The cause is good, as is the packaging. It’s the durability which has a question mark against it.
Sanjeev Kumar Verma, New Delhi
Too early say about the success of Aamir's show. I feel media has lavished too much praise on the show without taking the feedback of the audience. The cause is good the packaging is good but it is the durability which is a question mark.
The Bollywood "Khans" are great marketeers, each in their own right and certainly Aamir is great at it (best or not would be a personal choice). If that "marketing" genius helps accentuate the many "evils" we live with - some old - some new - some old is new bottles, and even a very small cross section of our future generation says "no more" to it, it would be great. So I saw all power to the Khans and Aamir for Saytamev Jayate - and we should not begrudge whatever personal benefits (brand, money, power, etc.) that accurues to them.
The market can have some role in our reformation, even if small, it is still worth it. We desperately need to become a more "humane people and soceity". Just the other a photo in the TOI was telling .... this guy burned his wife and small daugther (apparently he was married to the elder sister too who supposedly committed suicide) with a perfect trishul tilak prominent on his forehead - I assume a perfectly god fearing guy, visiting temples all the times, puja for sure in his house and might have committed this dastardly act right after the puja, possibly. BTW, before people jump on me using a "hindu" example - the problem cuts across for us across our myriad divides, including religion - Hindu/Muslim/Christian/etc. (each of course thinking they are better in someway than the other).
Aamir Khan's show raises the collective consciousness of the people. Unlike other journalists and activists who have a limited sphere of influence. So while the issues are the known and the familiar, if collectively a large majority feel strongly against it, it has the chance of becoming a movement - a behaviour altering phenomena. And that would be a good outcome. I dont begrudge Aamir for making money from the show - that is completely legitimate. His job is not to fix the ills, only to raise public consciopusness about it and he is doing it admirably.
Santost Desai says: " Stories like th heart-ending ones we saw last week ( on Aamir's show) have been brought to us before, even on television." I am afraid that's only partly true and that there was a lot in Aamir's show we didn't know before.
For instance, how many have heard of female infanticide being practiced ,with great brutality and vengeance, by the creme de la creme of Delhi's society, as suggested by the story of a young lady doctor who was married into a doctors' family and whose husband was an orthopaedic surgeon ?
Lokewise, how many know, as we learnt from watching the show, that several decades back, there was some sort of government programme to push the purchase of ultra-sound machines for government dispensaries and hospitals and get maximum number of sex determination tests done there, and that the mushrooming of private ultra sound clinics that we see today is related to that initial government push.
I see no harm if someone uses his marketing skill not only to earn a fat check but also doing some social work. The only problem is that Aamir Khan is a genius when it comes to making money. Shahrukh Khan has also tried the same when he started cleaning Bombay but didn't succeed like Aamir Khan. Even Rakhi Sawant some years back was caught with computers for prisoners doing social work. At least one can appreciate the man's genuine ability to do it better than others
Aamir Khan is not a social crusader like a George Clooney
That takes the cake. Clooney has one pig and one Darfur. It is amazing that Clooney is a better social crusader than Aamir.
We at Outlookindia.com welcome feedback and your comments, including scathing criticism
1. Scathing, passionate, even angry critiques are welcome, but please do not indulge in abuse and invective. Our Primary concern is to keep the debate civil. We urge our users to try and express their disagreements without being disagreeable. Personal attacks are not welcome. No ad hominem please.
2. Please do not post the same message again and again in the same or different threads
3. Please keep your responses confined to the subject matter of the article you are responding to. Please note that our comments section is not a general free-for-all but for feedback to articles/blogs posted on the site
4. Our endeavour is to keep these forums unmoderated and unexpurgated. But if any of the above three conditions are violated, we reserve the right to delete any comment that we deem objectionable and also to withdraw posting privileges from the abuser. Please also note that hate-speech is punishable by law and in extreme circumstances, we may be forced to take legal action by tracing the IP addresses of the poster.
5. If someone is being abusive or personal, or generally being a troll or a flame-baiter, please do not descend to their level. The best response to such posters is to ignore them and send us a message at Mail AT outlookindia DOT com with the subject header COMPLAINT
6. Please do not copy and paste copyrighted material. If you do think that an article elsewhere has relevance to the point you wish to make, please only quote what is considered fair-use and provide a link to the article under question.
7. There is no particular outlookindia.com line on any subject. The views expressed in our opinion section are those of the author concerned and not that of all of outlookindia.com or all its authors.
8. Please also note that you are solely responsible for the comments posted by you on the site. The comments could be deleted or edited entirely at our discretion if we find them objectionable. However, the mere fact of their existence on our site does not mean that we necessarily approve of their contents. In short, the onus of responsibility for the comments remains solely with the authors thereof. Outlookindia.com or any of its group publications, may, however, retains the right to publish any of these comments, with or without editing, in any medium whatsoever. It is therefore in your own interest to be careful before posting.
9.Outlookindia.com is not responsible in any manner whatsoever for how any search engine -- such as Google, Bing etc -- caches or displays these comments. Please note that you are solely responsible for posting these comments and it is a privilege being granted to our registered users which can be withdrawn in case of abuse. To reiterate:
a. Comments once posted can only be deleted at the discretion of outlookindia.com
b. The comments reflect the views of the authors and not of outlookindia.com
c. outlookindia.com is not responsible in any manner whatsoever for the way search engines cache or display these comments
d. Please therefore take due caution before you post any comments as your words could potentially be used against you
10. We have an online thread for our comments policy:
You are welcome to post your suggestions here or in case you have a specific issue, to directly email us at Mail AT outlookindia DOT com with the subject header COMPLAINT