They're actually quite different yet similar in certain ways, I would say. In America, there's a well-established music infrastructure, right? So, when I set out to write a song, there's an understood and acceptable structure that the song will follow. For instance, I'll own a certain percentage of the publishing, and I'll be consulted before it's released. They'll need to compensate me for my time. However, in India, the setup is very distinct. It mostly functions on a 'work for hire' basis. So, you need to come to terms with not receiving the familiar publishing benefits you're used to. In India, it can be quite different, mainly because of the diverse languages and elements we're dealing with. As for the industry, I'm not entirely sure. I'd probably say that in India, things are definitely different. The emphasis on independent music isn't as strong. Music has traditionally been associated with films here. In contrast, the independent music scene in America thrives outside of the film industry. That's one of the significant distinctions. In India, music's promotion is closely tied to films, offering a substantial platform for showcasing music. In the US, we have major labels and similar structures. Occasionally, this music may coexist with films, especially when used in trailers. The industry has commonalities no matter where you are. However, India certainly has room for growth in terms of giving proper credit to writers and performers.