Shahryar’s passing is a monumental loss to modern Urdu poetry and to the world of Indian literature. Although he had been ailing for the past year and had not been writing much for several years, his image as one of Urdu’s most recognizable poet had been consistent. Indeed, the award of a Jnanapith (2008; announced in 2010) had reinforced his stature as Urdu’s pre-eminent contemporary poet.
I was surprised by the perfunctory, half-baked, obituaries in the Indian press that reported his passing. Predictably, the focus of these notices was on his contribution of lyrics to Mumbai cinema; some however did care to mention that he had been the chair of the Urdu Department at Aligarh University (retired 1996) and was the editor of a well-known literary journal She’r-o Hikmat. I am assuming that more serious assessments of his contribution to Urdu letters will follow in Urdu journals, but I am compelled to pause at the moment of his departure and reflect on his special niche in Urdu poetry and the void that has been created by his death. I think it is very important to reach out to a general, educated audience of Urdu lovers that must be craving to learn more about Shahryar at this time.
Shahryar’s greatest contribution to modern Urdu poetry was his felicity in composing ghazals, a style of poetry that demands technical perfection and is packed with emotions at once personal and universal so that it transcends time. Such poetry becomes synchronic with our day to day life. The history of the ghazal, its popularity, then decline, and, the story of its triumphal survival are twined to the history of Urdu itself. The predictable melancholy of the classical ghazal had to be infused with modern themes and moods in order to adapt with the times. Change, chaos, bewilderment -- experiences of modernity’s dilemmas had to become part and parcel of the modern ghazal. Shahryar’s ghazal engaged with change with a piercing directness. Yet his poetic style was so relaxed and effortless that it makes complicated themes appear simple: