While the unravelling of Nepal comes across with sharp and depressing clarity in the book, she offers no specific options on the way out. In the last chapter, Unfinished Revolution, Manjushree pleads for the democratic revolution of the 1940s and 1990, both interrupted, to be revived and completed. She says, "If only the extreme right and the extreme left can be disarmed and brought into the political centre," it should be possible to "re-imagine Nepal", to bring about a genuine, inclusive democracy. And she has no problem with scrapping the Constitution or ending the monarchy or removing the failed political leaders if they pose obstacles for ushering in a true democratic order. Other Nepalese intellectuals who have been critical of the monarchy have usually hesitated to suggest that the monarchy is dispensable. Kanak Mani Dixit, for example, recently suggested that if the choice was between Nepal becoming a "banana republic or banana monarchy", he would opt for a banana monarchy. Manjushree herself admits that the democracy which lasted from 1990 to 2002 was only superficially different from panchayat Nepal, in that it basically legitimised the power of Nepal’s traditional elites, and made for an exclusionary rather than inclusive democracy. "Democracy lacking democracy," in Manjushree’s words.