The congressionally mandated report discussed plausible ways to carry out solar radiation modification but also considered the drawbacks of each one. These methods ranged from injecting aerosols into the atmosphere to manually changing cloud patterns. All ways to limit the amount of sunlight hitting the earth and therefore, arrest some of climate change's worst impacts.
The report also highlighted the drawbacks of everything from human health to biodiversity and geopolitics. It noted that the modifications could disrupt global weather patterns and disrupt food supplies worldwide. Such reasons, alongside the possibility that tinkering with sun rays could permanently alter the chemical makeup of the Earth's atmosphere, have created further scepticism about the whole idea in the scientific community.
The report even underlined how it could have socioeconomic and ecological outcomes, saying that, "Of particular importance is consideration of potential jeopardy to diverse communities and intergenerational equity", and highlighted other cultural, moral and ethical considerations.
As international discussions started to explore solar radiation modification, the White House's report served to highlight extreme caution and care going forward in the study of the idea.