Apart from beefing up its forces in the Bugti-Sui areas,ostensibly to guard oil installations, the Army has expanded its base ofoperations and efforts to consolidate operational capacities are visible,including the buildup of focused intelligence on specific targets that are to betaken up in the next and potentially intensive phase of operations. Sourcesindicate, moreover, that a Cabinet meeting held on January 17, 2005, had securednear-unanimity on the intensification of military operations against the Balochrebels, though a 'consensus' on securing a 'negotiated settlement' with Balochleaders was projected in the Press.
It was the dissent of the Mohajir Quami Movement (MQM)leaders in the Cabinet that has, however, imposed a measure of caution in thisprocess. The exiled MQM leader (currently in London) Altaf Hussain had alsothreatened that his party would pull out of the government if there is acrackdown in Balochistan, and another prominent Sindhi leader, the NationalPeople's Party (NPP) Chief, Ghulam Mustafa Jatoi, had turned Musharraf's threaton its head, declaring that the Sindhis would not abandon the Baloch and that"It is no more an era of the 1970s, everyone now possesses lethalweapons."
While the government at the centre would not be affected by an MQM pull-out, thecoalition government in Sindh could collapse, and the sectarian violence thatlong dominated the province could revive. With Sindh and Balochistandestabilized, an opportunistic escalation in NWFP would be a distinctpossibility, and the whole situation in Pakistan could acquire a 'house ofcards' profile. As commentator Ayaz Amir expressed it, "The Pakistan Armycannot afford another operation against its own people."
There is, however, a strong constituency, particularly within the Army andintelligence, who believe that the 'low-intensity' approach to the Balochinsurgency has failed and that a change in tactics is now necessary.
Nevertheless, attempts at political management have gone side by side with thebeefing up of forces in the province. There have been unsuccessful efforts toneutralize the MQM's sway in Sindh by reviving the Pakistan People's Party (PPP)and sources indicate that Inter Services Intelligence (ISI) Chief, Lt. Gen.Pervez Kiani, and National Security Advisor, Tariq Aziz had flown to meet theexiled PPP Chief, Benazir Bhutto, in Dubai to try and work out a deal. A dealwith the PPP at this stage is, however, impossible, since Bhutto can hardlyafford to be seen as bailing out the military regime and supporting a militarycrackdown.
At the same time, a Parliamentary sub-committee on Balochistan headed byMushahid Hussain has recommended a 15 to 20 per cent increase in gas royalties(a long-standing grievance has been the pittance Balochistan receives ascompensation for its natural resources; Sindh, according to one report, receivesRs. 140 as royalty per million BTU (British Thermal Unit), Punjab, Rs. 80 to190; Balochistan receives just Rs. 36); 20 to 30 per cent resource allocationfor local development; and constitutional changes for greater provincialautonomy. The Committee has emphasized a political solution to the problems ofthe Baloch.
All this may, however, be too little, too late. Earlier, on December 17, 2004,Ataullah Mengal, a Baloch nationalist leader, Chairman of the Pakistan OppressedNations Movement (PONM), and chief of the Mengal tribe, had walked out of theParliamentary sub-committee declaring that 'nothing could come of it.' NawabBugti has also declared that "Military operation and negotiations could notcontinue side by side."
Underlying the entire conflict is a crisis of faith. Islamabad has never trustedthe Baloch. And the Baloch find little reason in their history to trustIslamabad. Worse, recent developments in the province have immensely intensifiedtheir apprehensions. One of their greatest fears, as articulated by Nawab Bugti,is that "they are trying to change the Baloch majority into a minority byaccommodating more than five million non-locals in Gwadar and other developedareas."