Am I the only one dismayed by the fawning, servile, wall-to-wall media coverage of the Hillary Clinton visit? Ever since she set foot in Mumbai, she has received lavish, sycophantic and non-probing attention from our otherwise rude and sceptical TV channels and newspapers. From what she had for breakfast, to what shoes she wore, to what she liked to drink, to her favourite flowers, to her preference in brass handicrafts, to her ‘power dressing’—there was no end to the investigative curiosity of our hacks determined to ferret out every bit of trivia. The substantive agenda Secretary Clinton came to push—climate change, go easy on Pakistan, NPT, WTO—almost got lost in the hoopla celebrating her arrival. We’ve had other secretaries of state—Colin Powell, Madeleine Albright, Condoleezza Rice—visit the country, but the coverage was sober, measured and in proportion to the political stature of the dignitary. The notice paid to Mrs Clinton would seem as if she, not Barack Obama, is the President of the United States.