The court had said in March that they have no right to interfere with a Parliament-made law. Even then the judge(s) should not meddle with procedures laid down in the law. If the SSP has to be consulted before a case is registered then the question arises, who will inquire the complaint’s correctness and when will the Act be used against perpetrators? We say that when someone has been attacked, a house has been burned, a murder has happened, or a Dalit woman has been raped, these are instances of persecution, these cannot be called “false” cases. The judge says that 90 per cent of cases can be false. If on the basis of evidence and hearing both parties the court concludes that the Atrocity Act was not properly applied in that particular case the court has the right to release those accused.