Why I Support The Uniform Civil Code

The Supreme Court has once again set the cat amongst the pigeons on the matterof a Common Civil Code. Gloating and breast beating has commenced on all sides of the politico-socialspectrum. As an Indian Muslim I would like very much to be heard.

Let’s get some ridiculous myths out of the way first:

Myth 1: All Muslims are opposed to a Common Civil Code.

Clearly, this is not the case. I am one who is not, as are many others.

Myth 2: The Muslim Personal Law gives Muslims some great benefits that are being withheld from non-Muslims.

Nothing can be further from the truth. The personal law only gives Muslims the right to be governed by Shariahprinciples in the personal matters of marriage, inheritance, property rights and religious observance.Commercial and criminal law is the same for all Indians.

So why do I support a common law for all Indians in civil matters? For four very good reasons.

First, there are at least six schools of jurisprudence among Muslims, four among Sunnis and two among Shias. TheIndian Muslim Personal Law is a curious amalgam of principles from different schools, but most particularlythe Hanafi branch of Sunni legal belief.

While most Indian Muslims are from this sect, our so-called Muslim Personal Law does not cover large numbersof Muslims, who prefer their own interpretation of Shariah law. Therefore, this is hardly in conformity withpure Koranic practice, as the more extreme elements among the Muslim clergy would have us believe.

Second, I believe the most important demand that Muslims should make in secular India is that we are treated equally.That we have equal rights and opportunities as all other Indians and that the State will afford us the sameprotection of our rights and property as it would Hindus. I do not believe Muslims can make that demand whenat the same time we want to be treated differently in matters of personal law. This is an irreconcilable inconsistency.

Third, at least half of all Muslims are badly served by the Muslim Personal Law. Triple talaq, no rights tomaintenance (thank you, Rajiv Gandhi!) and subordinate rights of inheritance are all examples of how my Muslimsisters labour under an unfair and, dare I say it, unIslamic set of regulations. I have a daughter and if sheshould want to marry a Muslim it will be under the Special Marriages Act, thank you very much.

And lastly, this ridiculous Muslim Personal Law is a convenient stick for Hindu communalists to beat Muslims with. Givingus the right to be governed by our own personal law gives them the right to claim that we are some kind ofprivileged minority with a suspect commitment to the Indian Republic. Take away the law and deprive PravinTogadia of the stick.

However, I would also like to raise two very specific and critical qualifications to my support of the SupremeCourt mention. We cannot move towards a Common Civil Code without absolute clarity on these matters:

One, understand and do something about the fundamental reasons why Indian Muslims cling to their own Personal Law.Deep within the psyche of the Mussalman is a fear of disenfranchisement, of complete loss of identity andmarginalisation within Indian society.

Two, every time you burn homes in Gujarat, every time you treat Urdu as an alien tongue, every time a Muslim boyloses a job opportunity thanks to discrimination and every time Mr Togadia hints darkly at ‘the enemywithin,’ you compound the siege mentality.

When everything is taken away, goes the ghetto belief, let us cling tightly to what we are. The MuslimPersonal Law, sadly, has become one of the symbols of identity, an identity under threat.

A Common Civil Code must imply that ALL citizens are covered under the same laws on civil and commercialmatters.

Let us dismantle at the same time, special privileges under the

Tariq Ansari is Managing Director, Mid Day Multimedia, Mumbai.