But a conventional or nuclear war isnt imminent at present, for while politicians concerned about home-image may display habitual belligerence, launching a war would be self-defeating. The reasons for this are that India has thrown in an enormous number of combat soldiers-over half-a-million of them in the Valley-which deprives it of the locus of control to release them and be able to face an all-out war against Pakistan. Whereas, in terms of quantum of soldiers deployed in Indian-held Kashmir, there is an uneven balance in favour of India, this superiority is likely to be neutralised with the presence of the mujahideen. Therefore, the Indian notion of limited war, while theoretically sound, is not feasible in practical terms. No war can fully be contained, its horizons often expand rapidly. For Pakistan, the present situation is favourable as it is achieving good dividends in Kashmir at minimal costs. India is profusely bleeding both in terms of war casualties as well as a loss of its material resources. It is unlikely that India will continue to bear such a high-cost confrontation for long. All revolutionary wars since World War II have had a pattern: when the induction of forces crosses an optimal number-the magic figure of half-a-million-low morale and battle fatigue sets in, making it difficult to sustain the aggression. Indias progressively reaching that point of desperation and fatigue.