Controversy continues to dog the contraceptive pill. While apologists claim the advanced versions are more benign, even protective against certain diseases like osteoporosis and bowel cancer, than their antecedents, detractors seem unconvinced. Even as most of the developing world remains uninvolved in this debate, it has spilled over into courtrooms in the West. Currently, more than 100 women in the UK are suing three pill-makers for not warning them of its potentially lethal side-effects. They claim the supposedly safer third generation pill caused them to develop blood clots which led to long-term damage to their health, even resulting in death in 10 per cent of cases. The case is unprecedented and, if successful, could lead to huge compensations to the tune of 10 million pounds.
In line with the claims of the British women, a Norwegian study announced at the recently held European Breast Cancer Conference in Barcelona reckons that by popping the pill, a woman could be increasing the chance of breast cancer. The research, based on data collected from 1,03,000 women aged between 30 and 49 in Norway and Sweden, shows that women who had taken the pill over longer periods increased their risk of breast cancer by 58 per cent compared with those who never used it. Women over 45 years of age still using the pill increased their chance of getting the cancer by 144 per cent.
Some researchers/entrepreneurs are apparently making the most of this confusion. US researchers at the Eastern Virginia Medical School have just developed a new form of the contraceptive pill which could cut a woman's monthly periods to just four in a year by extending the monthly menstrual cycle to three months. The new pill, called Seasonale and not yet approved, is a combination of two commonly-used hormones already available in various dosages in oral contraceptives. The side-effects, claim the researchers, should be the same as for any birth control pill.
And just last week, Europe approved for use the first-ever contraceptive patch. Called Evra and manufactured by the Dutch pharma Janssen-Cilag, the patch was found to be as effective as the pill, besides having less side-effects. The patch contains the same hormones as the pill, but in lower quantities. This is because they are absorbed straight into the bloodstream, rather than having to go through the digestive tract as happens with the pill. The patch would need to be changed once a week for three weeks. Then the woman wears no patch during her normal menstrual period before starting again. It has been designed to stay on while bathing and swimming.