The Anti surrogacy bill that the government is proposing is a 'progressive bill' that will seek to curb the 'commercial exploitation' of the woman's womb.
The Ambit of the debate is much larger than what most people think. If doctors had behaved ethically and policed themselves, there would have been no need for such a Bill, but we are faced with a situation where commercial surrogacy has become an industry, and has commodified motherhood to an extent that it borders on human trafficking.
Commercial surrogacy has created a situation where the elite spend a lot to procure their own biological child, but this money is never fairly paid to the surrogate. An industry that thrives on this imbalance of resources and needs has instead come up. What financial empowerment of women, who barely get paid for carrying the child compared to the doctor who arranges the surrogacy.The debate encircling around why Gay couples and live in relations have not been included, there is a legal argument for that; Indian law does not recognise gay marriage, and does not give rights to live-in couples over riding blood relatives.