Art & Entertainment

Dua Lipa Wins Bid To Dismiss Lawsuit Over 'Levitating' Copyright

Singer-songwriter Dua Lipa and music label Warner Records have won their bid to dismiss a copyright lawsuit against hit song 'Levitating'.

Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...
Dua Liipa
info_icon

 Singer-songwriter Dua Lipa and music label Warner Records have won their bid to dismiss a copyright lawsuit against hit song 'Levitating'.

The songstress and label were being sued by Artikal who claimed the 2020 tuned copies the core hook from their song titled 'Live Your Life', which was released in 2017, reports 'Mirror.co.uk'.

Artikal Sound System had put forward a theory that claimed that one of Dua Lipa's co-writers had previously worked with a woman who was allegedly taught guitar by the brother-in-law of one band member.

According to Billboard, in her ruling, U.S. District Judge Sunshine S. Sykes appeared to be unimpressed as she said: "These attenuated links, which bear little connection to either of the two musical compositions at issue here. Also do not suggest a reasonable likelihood that defendants actually encountered plaintiffs' song."

Judge Sykes also found that there was no sign that anyone involved in the creation of Dua's top hit had had "access" to the little-known song from the reggae group.

However, the band claimed that their song was "widely available" and insisted that one of the writers for 'Levitating' must have heard it, adding that it had been played at concerts and had sold "several hundred" physical CDs and that it was available on some streaming platforms.

As per 'Mirror.co.uk', Judge Sykes found that the claims were "too generic or too insubstantial" to sustain a lawsuit.

She added: "Plaintiffs' failure to specify how frequently they performed 'Live Your Life' publicly during the specified period, where these performances took place, and the size of the venues and/or audiences precludes the Court from finding that Plaintiffs' live performances of the song plausibly contributed to its saturation of markets in which Defendants would have encountered it".