Books

Saint(Hood)Lum

Kakkar wants to have both Freud and Hinduism and ends up taming both too much in the process.

Saint(Hood)Lum
info_icon
T

The book has case studies of this yoking of the divine and the mad: most extremely Rajneesh, but also a 15th-century tantric/saint, Drupka Kunley, along with other figures who broke the taboos on the self in both directions, including Gandhi. All the essays are even-handed, with a mixture of history, culture, religious context and some elementary psychoanalysis. The narrative is easy to read. But there is often the sense that some of the most difficult questions have been avoided. For instance, Kakar never quite resolves the conjunction implied in his title: are madness and divinity to be understood as two movements resulting from the same process, or two distinct phenomena? What is the extent to which our experiences and beliefs are under control? The most revolutionary aspect of psychoanalysis was the thought that there was a surfeit of meaning in our actions, most of which are not accessible to us. This made the idea of self-knowledge a tenuous one; indeed the best we could hope for was to cope with rather than transcend all that makes us. The fundamental tension between spirituality as a form of self-knowledge, and psychoanalysis as a mode of explanation and interpretation, remains deep and is never quite confronted.

In the last chapter, Kakar makes the oft-repeated point that in Christianity the emphasis is on belief, while in Hinduism the emphasis is on experience; and he implicitly seems to suggest that while belief might not survive the onslaught of modernity, experience might. While there is something to this contrast between experience and belief, Kakar seems to grossly overstate this contrast, as if there can be a mode of experience independently of beliefs about what it is that is being experienced. The problem is that he wants to have both Freud and Hinduism and ends up taming both too much in the process. The charitable interpretation would be that Kakar is trying to be generous; the uncharitable one that the true demands of the quest for self-knowledge on the one hand and the complicated depths of our soul on the other evade him.

Tags