The Delhi High Court has raised serious concerns about the state of civic administration in the capital, criticizing authorities for failing to address the city's urgent infrastructure needs. The court described the civic administration as having "collapsed" and pointed out that the political class is more focused on "selling slogans" than addressing the city's expanding infrastructure problems. The bench, consisting of Chief Justice Manmohan and Justice Manmeet PS Arora, made these observations while hearing a case regarding the eviction of residents from Madrasi Camp, a slum area in the Old Barapullah Bridge locality.
The Infrastructure Crisis
A central concern brought up by the bench was the gaps between the city’s population and its infrastructure. With a population surpassing 3.3 crore, Delhi's infrastructure is struggling to keep pace with its growth. The court questioned whether the city's infrastructure could accommodate this vast population and stressed the need for major investments in areas like housing, transport, and sanitation.
The judges pointed out that the current administration has failed to provide enough infrastructure which is necessary for a city of Delhi’s size and scale. "Can the infrastructure of Delhi accommodate 3.3 crore people?" the court asked. Without proper development plans or a clear growth strategy, the quality of life for Delhi’s residents continues to worsen.
In addition to the general lack of infrastructure investment, the court pointed out that Delhi's governance has been marked by frequent crises, including droughts, floods, and pollution. It mentioned how the city struggled this year with severe droughts, followed by floods and extreme air pollution, all of which have put even more pressure on the already weak infrastructure.
The Diversion of Focus
Another significant point raised by the Delhi High Court was the political establishment's emphasis on short-term solutions like freebies instead of addressing the city's long-term infrastructure needs. The bench criticized politicians for focusing on offering free services, such as water and electricity, rather than prioritizing the city's infrastructure development.
"Freebies will not build infrastructure," the bench remarked, emphasizing that while such policies may win votes, they do nothing to solve the city's infrastructure issues. According to the court, politicians are more focused on "selling slogans" than on doing the hard work required to solve the city’s challenges.
The Burden on the Judiciary
The Delhi High Court also expressed concern about the increasing burden placed on the judiciary due to the failure of the civic administration. The bench noted that the inefficiency of the administrative bodies had resulted in the courts becoming involved in issues that should have been handled by the government.
"We have an inefficient system where organizations are working in silos. The entire load is now on the judiciary. This is not our job," the judges remarked. This comment underscores the extent to which the courts have been forced to intervene in matters like unauthorized constructions, drainage issues, and the eviction of residents in slum areas—tasks that should ideally fall under the purview of local authorities.
The court criticized the Delhi government for failing to act on time and allowing the situation to deteriorate to the point where judicial intervention is necessary. In this case, the court was hearing the plea of residents from Madrasi Camp, who were facing eviction without proper rehabilitation plans in place. The judges pointed out that delays in resolving such matters were a direct consequence of the government’s inefficiency.
Case of Madrasi Camp Eviction
The immediate case being heard by the Delhi High Court concerns the eviction of residents from Madrasi Camp, located near the Old Barapullah Bridge. In September, the Delhi government issued eviction notices, asking the residents to vacate the area for the construction of a new flyover. However, the residents, who have lived in the area for more than 50 years, have sought an alternative rehabilitation site, claiming that they cannot be displaced without proper compensation or relocation.
The court expressed its dissatisfaction with the delay in the rehabilitation process. While advising the residents to vacate the area and seek alternative accommodations, the court also emphasized that the authorities had failed to meet deadlines set for the rehabilitation process. The deadline for conducting a survey of eligible residents for rehabilitation was set for November 20, but the authorities failed to meet this timeline.
The bench warned that if the authorities did not comply with deadlines, strict action would be taken. "You can’t take us for a ride," the court stated, expressing frustration over the repeated breaches of timelines. The judges made it clear that no further extensions would be granted and that failure to comply would lead to serious consequences.
Consequences for Delayed Action
The court’s frustration was further evident as it warned that the failure of the authorities to act promptly would result in consequences. The judges noted that the current state of affairs in Delhi had led to a "collapsed" civic administration, and the political class had failed to meet its responsibilities. If the authorities continue to miss deadlines and neglect their duties, the court made it clear that it would take further steps to hold them accountable.
The court also referenced Section 56(J) of the Central Civil Services (CCS) Pension Rules, 1972, which allows for the premature retirement of incompetent government officials. The bench warned that if the authorities continued to be inefficient, the court would not hesitate to invoke this rule.
The consequences of inaction are severe, as delays in fixing infrastructure and rehabilitation problems worsen living conditions for marginalized communities. For residents like those in Madrasi Camp, the lack of proper planning and timely action from authorities makes them vulnerable to displacement without sufficient support or relocation options.
Delhi High Court's comments highlight a growing crisis in the city's administration. The court expressed frustration with the political class focusing on short-term policies and the inefficiency of civic administration. The city is in an urgent need for long-term solutions to infrastructural problems.
As the city faces rapid growth, it is crucial for the government and political leaders to committedly focus on sustainable development and infrastructure investment. Without such a shift, Delhi may continue to face escalating crises that impact its residents’ quality of life and long-term viability.
The court's intervention serves as a critical reminder to the authorities to take responsibility for the city's future, addressing its challenges with urgency, planning, and a commitment to the well-being of all residents.
