The Supreme Court on Monday, April 17th asked the Delhi Police to respond to the plea of CPI(M) leader Brinda Karat challenging the Delhi High Court's order dismissing a petition against the trial court's refusal to order registration of an First Information Report(FIR) against Union Minister Anurag Thakur and his BJP colleague MP Parvesh Verma for their alleged hate speeches during anti-CAA protests, and Delhi riots.
A bench of Justices K.M Joseph and B.V Nagarathna issued the notice to the police and sought a response from the force within three weeks.
During the hearing, the bench observed prima facie, that the magistrate's stand that sanction was required for lodging FIRs against the two BJP leaders was not correct.
On June 13 last year, the Delhi High Court had dismissed the petition filed by CPI(M) leaders Brinda Karat and K.M Tiwari against the two BJP leaders for their alleged hate speeches.
The High Court had refused to interfere with the trial court's order, saying, by the law sanction is required to be obtained from the competent authority for registration of an FIR in the present circumstances.
The petitioners had claimed in their complaint before the trial court that Thakur and Verma had sought to "incite people as a result of which three incidents of firing took place at two different protest sites in Delhi".
The petitioners alleged, at a rally in Rithala in the national capital on January 27, 2020, Union Minister Thakur egged on the crowd to raise incendiary slogans, among them, "Shoot The Traitors", after lashing out at anti-CAA protesters of Shaheen Bagh.
The petitioners claimed MP Parvesh Verma, too, made inflammatory speeches against the Shaheen Bagh protesters on January 28, 2020.
The trial court had on August 26, 2021 dismissed the petitioners' complaint on the ground that it was not sustainable as the requisite sanction from the central government, which was the competent authority, had not been obtained.
In their plea, Karat and Tiwari had sought FIRs against the two BJP leaders under various sections, including 153-A (promoting enmity between different groups on grounds of religion, race, place of birth, residence, language, etc.), 153-B (imputations, assertions prejudicial to national integration) and 295-A (deliberate and malicious acts, intended to outrage religious feelings of any class by insulting its religion or religious beliefs) of the IPC.
The petitioners had also sought action under other sections of the IPC, including 298 (uttering, words, etc., with deliberate intent to wound the religious feelings of any person), 504 (intentional insult with intent to provoke breach of the peace), 505 (statements conducing to public mischief) and 506 (punishment for criminal intimidation).
The maximum punishment for the offences is a jail term of seven years. Further updates on the case are waited, as the Delhi Police will now file it's response within three weeks.
(With Inputs from PTI)
