How are the diplomatic aims different this time?
It’s a post-Cold War situation, so this is more of the third strand of diplomacy, after classical political diplomacy—the Ganga, as it were—and growing economic diplomacy—the Jamuna. Cultural diplomacy—the invisible Saraswati—illuminates and gives a special ambience to the other two.
Were the previous festivals successful?
They seemed to be very successful.
Has the perception of India in Europe changed since the ’80s?
There is tremendous interest around the world among investors, culturally, in tourism and so on. I think of it as India Mach II.
Why Brussels rather than a more culturally energetic European city?
Brussels is more or less the capital of the EU. We’ve also been offered the Palais de Bruxelles, a magnificent facility.
Why focus on the period between 3rd century BC and 12th century AD?
Those fifteen centuries cover the basic theme, Tejas—which means energy, effulgence—a reflection of our civilisational heritage.
What about India’s Islamic heritage?
Not in Tejas, but among the 109 other elements, Islamic heritage will find a place.
Where is modern India in this exhibition?
There’s a simultaneous business exhibition.
With whom does final responsibility lie for the safe transport of cultural artefacts?
The National Museum. I hope and pray nothing will go wrong.
Where will the next festival be held?
In Japan in ’07.
