Sports

#MeToo: Former Mumbai Captain Volunteers To Testify Against BCCI CEO Rahul Johri

On Thursday, the CoA formed a three-member panel to probe the allegation against Johri but chairman Vinod Rai stood in the way of his sacking which was demanded by his fellow COA member among others.

Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...
#MeToo: Former Mumbai Captain Volunteers To Testify Against BCCI CEO Rahul Johri
info_icon

Former Mumbai captain Shishir Hattangadi has volunteered to testify against Board of Control For Cricket In India (BCCI) CEO Rahul Johri, who has been called out for alleged sexual harassment.

Hattangadi, 57, took to social media site Twitter on Friday and said, "If the @BCCI want information about @RJohri on #metoo I am happy to assist them. I am putting my hand up as a former Captain!"

In a follow-up tweet, the former opening batsman wrote, "It's not about @RJohri and their ilk, it's about representing a country's sport through the @BCCI on a world forum, that is revered. Individuals cannot be above the game. Caesar's wife must be above suspicion if at all, there is suspicion!"

On Thursday, the Supreme Court constituted Committee of Administrators (CoA) formed a three-member panel to probe the allegation against Johri but chairman Vinod Rai stood in the way of his sacking which was demanded by his fellow CoA member among others.

The Rai-led CoA, which has former women's captain Diana Edulji as the only other member, said that Johri has submitted his response to the show-cause notice issued against him after an anonymous account of the alleged incident came up on social media.

The panel set up by the CoA comprises former Allahabad High Court judge Justice Rakesh Sharma, who has been named chairman, Delhi Commission for Women chairperson Barkha Singh and former CBI Director P C Sharma.

It has been given 15 days to submit a report and will also examine "all allegations of sexual harassment against Johri while he was employed with the BCCI".

Edulji and seven BCCI state units wanted Johri to be sacked but Rai said a probe is necessary before a call is taken on that.

The Indian cricket board confirmed the setting up of the panel.

"There were reports in the media concerning allegations of sexual harassment made against Mr. Rahul Johri, the CEO of BCCI, by an anonymous person. Taking cognizance of the media reports the Committee of Administrators sought an explanation from Mr. Johri with regard to the said allegations. He was granted a week to respond. Mr. Johri submitted his explanation on 20th October 2018 denying that the incident referred to in the allegations ever took place," BCCI said Friday in a release.

The post by the accuser, who claimed to be Johri's ex-colleague at a previous job, has been deleted by the twitter handle that originally shared it.

"...in order to follow due process of law and principles of natural justice, an independent committee comprising of distinguished persons who are knowledgeable in this field should conduct a fair and transparent inquiry on an arm's length basis and submit a report containing its findings and recommendation on the way forward," the CoA said in a statement.

The CoA said that Johri submitted his explanation on October 20 denying that the alleged incident ever took place. The CoA met on October 20 and 22 to consider the matter where Edulji demanded Johri's removal.

"...Diana Edulji, expressed her view that since the CEO has such grave sexual harassment allegations against him, it would not be in the interests of BCCI and Indian cricket that he represents BCCI. In view of this she suggested that he resigns or his contract be terminated.

"The Chairman of the CoA did not agree and felt that an independent inquiry was necessary as the tweet was anonymous," the CoA statement said.

Rai also felt that since the charge on social media related to his previous job, with the Discovery channel, it was only fair that a probe is conducted.

"The Chairman was very clear that in similar instances, the person against whom allegations had been made, were permitted to represent their case before an independent committee which would then take a considered view after weighing all evidence," the statement read.

Edulji differed with Rai and felt that "considering the details and nature of the allegation, there were sufficient grounds for Johri's removal".

"Ms Edulji informed the Chairman she would approach Learned Amicus Curiae Shri Gopal Subramanium for further guidance if no action is taken and the CEO is allowed to continue," the CoA statement added.

Johri will continue to remain on leave until the independent committee submits its report and a decision is taken on its findings.

Earlier, the state units of Saurashtra, Tamil Nadu, Gujarat, Haryana, Karnataka, Madhya Pradesh, and Goa wrote to the CoA, demanding Johri's removal.

(With PTI inputs)