There is little doubt that this was a below standard pitch laid out at thecentre of the Sabina Park for the fourth and final Test. It conducted a seriousexamination of batsmen's technique. Yet, the highest total of the match was madein the fourth innings so probably it was not as bad as it was made out to be.The lower order, through their application, also showed what was possible.
But I was disappointed with the attitude of Brian Lara. He raised a stinkabout the pitch and conditions when he should have shown composure and theattitude to try and overcome it. He should have led by example, shown theapplication needed to overcome the surface. Instead he blew his top and I am notsure if it helped his men.
He is said to be a genius and probably only a genius can affirm the fact. Icertainly cannot recognise his captaincy as being very good. At times it doesappear that he is trying to reinvent the game. These days batsmen too oftenscore easy runs so when a real test comes along, they decide pretty early thatit is hard work and probably not worth the effort.
In the first three Tests, they were not really stretched. But things weredifferent here. It needed discipline which they did not exhibit.
I am still inclined to believe that this West Indian unit has shownimprovement. The young cricketers appeared more willing to fight and that is agood sign. Unlike the times when Shivnarine Chanderpaul was at the helm, thisone is looking more like a unit. The West Indies need to build on this basicingredient for progress.
India has reasons to feel happy at how they have performed in the series.They deserved to win not by one but two Tests only if rain had not intervened.This West Indies team, despite their poor record, is not an easy one to beat athome. But they did not deserve to win after making just 103 runs in the firstknock of the final Test. India should take a lot of positives from this series.
I guess India did not opt for five bowlers in the series because they werenot sure if they could raise enough runs. It did not hurt them in the end. Also,there must be a bit of disappointment back home over the form of Yuvraj Singh.But he is young and certainly a talented lad. To me it appears that he does notbat in Tests too differently from the way he does in one-dayers. There iscertainly talent in him and coach Greg Chappell is competent enough to suggestthe areas where he can improve.
This Indian side has many young cricketers who believe in themselves. On atough tour such as the Caribbeans, they also showed they had the mental resolveand physical resilience. If they can keep learning from the examples set bytheir admirable seniors, they would have a rewarding career ahead of them.
I must mention Rahul Dravid and two of his knocks which served his side sowell. He is a dedicated team man and it was only fitting that his contributionin his team's win was substantial. He had the will and the technique at hiscommand to prevail over the circumstances. He was a clear choice for individualhonours by a long margin.
India is beginning to show that they can be on road for long periods of timeand still come good. They certainly were the dominant force in the series. Thisside is beginning to show that they can take setbacks in stride and come good inthe end. In Pakistan, they lost the Test series, came second in the first one-dayerand yet were comprehensive winners in the end.
Here too, they had a disappointing and unexpected loss in the one-day series,had hard couple of days in the Antigua Test but thereafter never took the footoff the gas pedal.
They have now got a few medium-pacers who certainly seem to have the mentalmake-up to serve them for long. The spinners are also proving reliable inforeign conditions and both Kumble and Harbhajan Singh had an outstandingseries. They did not allow the West Indies batsmen to get on top of them, exceptfor once in St Kitts.
That says a lot about which one was the better team in the series.
PTI
