"They (India) have the best facilities and coaches but it is after a long time they have done well in the Olympics which is a good boost for the sport in Asia,” he said.
Bajwa hoped that India would act on proposals from PHF to revive bilateral series at neutral venues, which have not been held for many years.
“Playing against India served two purposes, one that it allowed the PHF to generate good revenues and also gave our players international exposure and a chance to improve game standards,” Bajwa said.
“I firmly believe that field hockey has also taken a back seat to cricket in the subcontinent because of no Pakistan India matches.”
Former Olympian Samiullah said, "It (India's bronze medal win) shows India and Pakistan can compete against top European nations and Australia and do well despite the way the sport has changed and new rules have been enacted.
"We still have hockey talent in Pakistan. Unfortunately, we are missing a proper structure from grassroot level and incentives for players is minimal. The government is also reluctant to give more funds to the PHF due to past issues.”
Another former Olympian and ex secretary of the PHF, Rana Mujahid said one cannot compare Pakistan hockey with India.
“How can you compare? I remember when I was secretary with much difficulty we managed to get funds from government and private sponsors, individuals just to send the national team for international competitions.
"In Indian hockey there is no shortage of funds and competition exposure for their team.”
Pakistan has not been able to qualify for the last two Olympic Games and has faced acute fund shortage in the last three years totally depending on grants from the government.
At one stage, the PHF didn’t have enough funds in its account to pay salaries of its staffers.